The Planted Tank Forum banner

Glutaraldehyde calculator

14K views 34 replies 20 participants last post by  cheekycharly  
#1 · (Edited)
Hey folks. I needed to make a Glut. solution, so built this. Maybe you'll find it useful, too. It'll clone popular Carbon sources (1.6% Glut) with Cidex, Metricide, or Glut. of various %'s.

http://glut.petalphile.com

It only requires Javascript and a modern browser. Have fun!
 
#6 ·
How about for Metricide 28...its only different with .1%
I think there is something wrong with your formula...If I ain't mistake to get the same concentration of excel you need to mix 475ml of Metricide with 525 ml of water.....

This is your post in APC right?
http://www.aquaticplantcentral.com/forumapc/showpost.php?p=572968&postcount=26
How come formula changed?

http://www.plantedtank.net/forums/fertilizers-water-parameters/143641-glutaraldehyde-excel.html

Its giving me "Add 615mL of your 2.6% Glutaraldehyde source to the 1000mL container" for a liter, its 140ml of extra Glutaraldehyde then the previous calculation..

None the less I do 50/50.
 
#7 ·
Thanks nalu86, Dempsey, Angry the Clown, and dbosman! I'd love any help spreading the link around.

Joraan,

Metrex's MSDS for Metricide indicates it includes surfacants. Are you sure Metricide 28 is safe for the aquarium?

That is my post on APC! This calc had other advantages for me. (I had never built an-all Javascript/CoffeeScript calculator before, and I far prefer webapps to a spreadsheet.)

But I don't know what you're entering into the spreadsheet to get this:
If I ain't mistake to get the same concentration of excel you need to mix 475ml of Metricide with 525 ml of water.....
The spreadsheet with 1.5% target for our DIY mix, using a 2.6% Glut. source (Metricide 14) requires ~577mL of Metricide 14 diluted with ~423mL water for a 1000mL DIY solution.

Let's do this together:
(% Glut target) * (mL final solution) / (% Glut in Glut source) = mL Glut. Source to dilute.
1.5% * 1000mL / 2.6% =~ 577mL.

Your proportions make 1.235% Glut. using Metricide 14.

The spreadsheet and this calculator give the same results if you change the Intended Concentration (B7) from 1.5% to 1.6%. I'm not entirely convinced Excel is exactly 1.5% Glut until someone pulls out a spectrometer (and the difference between 1.5% and 1.6% is not significant), Azoo's and EasyLife's recommended dosing are in the same ballpark, and until now I had doubted anyone would freak out over 0.1% of something.
 
#8 ·
Metricide 28 is safe, I was using Metricide 14 before. Metricide 28 is only 2.5% Glut concentrated.

Using this
"Let's do this together:
(% Glut target) * (mL final solution) / (% Glut in Glut source) = mL Glut. Source to dilute.
1.5% * 1000mL / 2.6% =~ 577mL."

I'm getting 600ml while using above formula :1.5%*1000ml/2.5%= 600ml.

Excel spread sheet answer still remains 475 ml....Now I am really confused.
Good thing I need to mix new batch today. will try 600ml instead of 475ml and see how plant reacts.
 
#9 ·
Hi wet,

It looks like you have made a good start on it but it has two issues.

First why are we using 1.6% instead of the Seachem Excel concentration of 1.5% as the target concentration? The resulting concentration is about 7% stronger than Excel and requires 7% more Glut/Metricide/etc to formulate.

The second issue is a "bug". If I indicate I are using 5% Glut as your source solution the result indicates I am using a 10% source solution and indicates an incorrect amount (by 50%) to add.
Bug
Image


Here are some screen shots of the Glut calculator verses wet's calculator for the same volume and concentrations. Disregard the cost/ml and Total columns, they do not apply to this calculation.

I'll stick with the Excel based Glut calculator on my computer at this point; but this is a good start for an online version.

Thanks,
-Roy

Image


Image
 
#11 ·
Hi wet,

It is an excellent first effort, and for those that don't have the ability or inclination to use an Excel based calculator it will be an excellent asset.

Keep up the good work!

Thanks,
-Roy
 
#16 ·
Hi wet,

The link doesn't seem to be working in this post however the one on the other site does. This is a much "cleaner" and elegant calculator.