The Planted Tank Forum banner

BDBS vs PFS

8.6K views 16 replies 6 participants last post by  slipfinger  
#1 · (Edited by Moderator)
After seeing so many people not recommend going with Eco Complete..... I've been wondering about black diamond blasting sand.

My plants aren't doing anything root wise in pool filter sand, so how does the black diamond do so much better? I'm assuming it's a larger grain in the 20/40 size?

Does it compact as much as PFS or is oxygen able to pass through it?

Don't want to have the same situation I've currently run into if I go with BDBS. Thanks!

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

I'm also assuming like PFS.... No fish waste or food can get past the BDBS top layer to fertilize plants?

May be just best for me to go with eco complete or a normal gravel after all but wanted to hear thoughts on this sand vs pool filter sand.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
 
#2 ·
After using all that you mention: PFS, Eco-complete, BDS, my opinions are:

I dont care for PFS due to compaction issues. Others experience may vary.

BDS-- I do not like the looks of BDS in the aquarium- aesthetics choice on my part. Other opinions may vary. If your concern is compaction - I didn't notice a problem with this. I did have an issue with my corydoras of a higher occurrence of bacterial issues. This has been reported as a side-effect of the sharpness of the medium on bottom-dwellers undersides. If you dont have bottom-dwellers, no issue here.

I have used Eco-complete many times. I like using it as a base and topping with Caribsea sand. I like to use Caribsea sand, a grain size from .5 mm to 1.0 mm, due to the excellent results I get more from from my fish than my plants. For me, fish always come first and this has proven best in my case. However, I have good results with plant growth as well.

Let me stress that this is my experience and opinion... before someone wants to misconstrue my opinion for law.
 
#4 ·
I think I just don't want to make a lateral move going from PFS to bdbs if that's the case.

PFS I see some people doing well. Me, it just hasn't worked and don't want to repeat it.

I have a tractor supply not far from here so I think I'll try it. Can't hurt and won't be an expensive test. If it doesn't give me the results I like, I can then move to eco complete finally. If it does better than the PFS, then it's a win too!

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
 
#6 · (Edited by Moderator)
OK looks like I'm gonna try bdbs this weekend. From everything I've researched, this blacks and *should be* as good and much cheaper than eco complete. Like I said, my pfs has been horrible, so I'm now leary of sand.

Should it not work out, I've got plenty of time and will not mind switching over to eco complete. Can't wait to try it out!


Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Oh and how many bags should I get for a 125?

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
 
#10 ·
I've used BDBS with dirt under it and also used it plain. Never had problems with plants growing. I've used the pool sand and didn't care much for it. It seems to compact more so than the blasting sand. I did have issues with the plants in the pool sand, but that might have just been me doing something wrong. I have a tank now in the process of cycling using the dirt and BDBS. So far it's my favorite substrate. Hope that helps.
 
#17 ·
You should have no issues with BDBS. If you are having issues growing the plants you listed above in BDBS, you will need to starting look at other things that might be causing your issues, it will not be your substrate.

I think I read somewhere, where this guy named @burr740 actually won the Dutch Tank Catagory of the AGA International Aquascaping Contest, using BDBS. I can't confirm this, but if its true this guy must have magical powers!