Yea I know so much conflicting info out thereYes a water softener will lower the Gh but softeners that use salt usually add salt to the water. I have herd many different opinions on this question not sure what is right. My softener lowers the Gh to zero according to an API GH test.
you should try putting your ro system after your water softener it will increase the life of your ro membrane considerably since it removes scaling minerals.I have a water softener but did not want to use that on my tanks . Instead I have an RO unit that I connected to the main water line before the softener. That's what I use in my tanks after remineralization.
And yeah there is a ton of wrong information out there too.
RO is a good way to go. The KH and GH of my tap water fluctuates a lot.
You should place the RO unit after the softener....let the softener do the 'heavy lifting' of removing Ca, Mg, and other elements...it'll substantially lower the TDS before your water enters the RO unit and extend the life of your RO membranesI have a water softener but did not want to use that on my tanks . Instead I have an RO unit that I connected to the main water line before the softener. That's what I use in my tanks after remineralization.
Hmmm....I believe it's the resin beads that pull Ca, Mg, and other elements out of your household water....the beads are typically enclosed in a large cylinder...when 'full' the resin beads are washed in a brine bath (consisting of NaCl but could be KCl)...the cleansing cycle typically runs in the early AM hours when water usage is nil...some sodium may be left behind during the cleansing cycle if the brine bath isn't completely flushed away but that doesn't mean the softener is exchanging sodium for Ca, Mg, etc.....at least that's how I understand softeners to workIn a nutshell, Water softeners exchange calcium and magnesium for sodium. A reverse osmosis filter will remove almost all impurities and minerals.
In this case, the conflicting information you see when it comes to sodium in a freshwater aquarium is usually from someone who isn't well-versed in what freshwater systems need. It's generally a bad idea to use sodium if you're running a freshwater system. A bad idea, in general, for tanking.Yea I know so much conflicting info out there
Kh 3 gh 11In this case, the conflicting information you see when it comes to sodium in a freshwater aquarium is usually from someone who isn't well-versed in what freshwater systems need. It's generally a bad idea to use sodium if you're running a freshwater system. A bad idea, in general, for tanking.
Other softeners use potassium salts to exchange hardness, which can also cause a ton of potential problems in a planted tank.
What's your gH, @Kidfish? You likely don't need to lower it. What's your kH?
You could certainly go the RODI and remineralization route to have total control over your parameters. But it may not be necessary. Are you a new hobbyist or do you have some experience under your belt with a plan to be part of the hobby longterm? If not, you may not want an RODI system.Kh 3 gh 11
I am setting up a 29 G for Apisto Borelli so I am concerned about those numbers
A lot of valuable info will respond further when not at work thanksYou could certainly go the RODI and remineralization route to have total control over your parameters. But it may not be necessary. Are you a new hobbyist or do you have some experience under your belt with a plan to be part of the hobby longterm? If not, you may not want an RODI system.
An active/buffering substrate like ADA Aqua Soil could be helpful for you. It would lower kH quite a bit, thereby making your water more acidic/softer. A gH of 11 probably isn't too much of an issue with most commercially-bred specimens in the hobby. But a basic, affordable water filter may be able to lower both kH and gH a bit for you.
Have you checked out tank journals of others who keep Apistogramma borellii to see what kind of parameter ranges others are using?
Alternatively, if you're new to the hobby, have you considered other species that would be better suited for your existing parameters? That would make life a lot simpler than having to parameter chase or invest in a couple hundred dollars in an RO system. There are absolutely tons of fish and invertebrates that would thrive with a kH of 3 and gH of 11.
I am kinda a step up from beginner. I have a 75 gallon nano tank moderately planted and nice aquascaping with about 12 different species of fish with dwarf crayfish and shrimp all doing well for about 6 months. But I love those apistogramma and would like to give it a shot. I work 6 days 12 hour days so looking for the easiest and least cost effective way to work those numbers, I was thinking since Apisto Borelli is supposed to be the easiest and most hardiest l would go with them. I am not sure if the tannins from all the driftwood plus maybe almond leaves could cut it if not l was thinking a faucet filter could help.A lot of valuable info will respond further when not at work thanks