I'm confused! How is this "silent cycle" any different to a normal fishless cycle in a planted tank? Only difference seems to be in the mindset of the tank-keeper whereby the focus is on enjoying the plants grow for the first month or two, rather than impatiently testing for and worrying about ammonia / nitrite / nitrate levels.
There is also an important distinction to be made depending upon the substrate used. With inert substrate I can see that it is (possibly) ok to add (a small number of) fish on day 2 as heavy planting should be able to soak up the low levels of ammonia produced by the fish and decaying leaves. But if the substrate is active soil (e.g. Amazonia) that leaches soooooo much ammonia for the first few weeks / months, then no amount of planting is going to be able to instantly soak it all up, so fish shouldn't be added for some time. Think it is important to be clear about this BIG difference depending upon the chosen substrate.
In that linked
"About The Silent Cycle" thread,
one post says:
"Also, IMO, Silent Cycle has not been adopted to a great extent by the planted tank community, in favor of other methods. I think that contributes to some nervousness around this method."
But is this not exactly how every single ADA style planted tank is setup? Plant heavily from day 1, do lots of water changes, wait a few weeks before adding fish, and enjoy the plants rather than worrying about the cycle. I thought that this was pretty much the basic instruction that comes with Amazonia soil? Am I missing something here, or is this just a geographic difference in what's considered normal? Here in Singapore, the Japanese (ADA) approach to pretty much anything and everything seems to be favourite!