The Planted Tank Forum banner

Substrate Fertilizer vs PPS Classic

977 Views 5 Replies 2 Participants Last post by  jellopuddinpop
I'm in the transition to a planted tank and my plants will arrive next week, but after some reading about fertilizer I have some question. Here's my tank setting:

Tank dimension: 5 ft length x 18 inches width x 2 ft height
Plants: most fast growing and hardy plants, and a few anubias nana, peacock moss, java fern and Cryptocoryne petchii
Livestock: 1 silver arowana (1ft), 3 severum cichlids, 2 parrot cichlids, 1 blackghost, 2 track tire eel, 1 small albino pleco.
Fertilizer: 00 size gel-cap of osmocote plus (1 per 6 inches), Flourish per direction, Fe/Mg per direction
Lighting: 13W T2 light 950 Lumen 6500K x 2
CO2: pressurized CO2 system, a drop checker is in place.
Filtration: Fluval 106 and 306.

When I'm researching about iron supplement, I came across PPS system and I'm particular interested in the Classic one. I know many aquarium hobbiest use PPS-Pro but I feel like PPS Classic fits me more because my goal is to have a well balanced tank without the need for frequent water change.

My question is, with the Osmocote plus in the substrate, do I still need the PPS fertilizer in water coloum? It seems redundant but I want to know if that will be good supplement. I also want to know if my lighting will be enough? It's a T2 lighting so it's more efficient than T5, but how do I do the PAR or watt per gallon conversion?

Thank you all for the input and advice in advanced :grin2:
1 - 6 of 6 Posts
This doesn't answer your question, and I apologize for that, but that tank isn't nearly large enough for the fish you have. That Arowana is going to keep growing, and fast. You want to have a minimum of 240G for him to be a happy fish.

I don't mean to preach, but you really should rectify that soon and be a responsible fish keeper.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
Yes, sadly I'm not aware of that until I got the fish. In the future when the arowana gets too large for the tank, I might not have other option but to give it away. That's really sad and I've already upgrade the tank once for it. I think that's the penalty for making the ignorant choice of fish. I just hope that day will never come.

This doesn't answer your question, and I apologize for that, but that tank isn't nearly large enough for the fish you have. That Arowana is going to keep growing, and fast. You want to have a minimum of 240G for him to be a happy fish.

I don't mean to preach, but you really should rectify that soon and be a responsible fish keeper.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
Yes, sadly I'm not aware of that until I got the fish. In the future when the arowana gets too large for the tank, I might not have other option but to give it away. That's really sad and I've already upgrade the tank once for it. I think that's the penalty for making the ignorant choice of fish. I just hope that day will never come.
Well, as long as you're aware, you're one step ahead of (sadly) a lot of fish keepers. These are living creatures, and it makes me so sad when I see fish that are obviously too large for their home.

There was a LFS near me that had a 32" Asian Arowana in a 90G tank, and it made me mad enough to stop doing business there. When I brought it up to the owner, his answer was "we thought it would sell by now, but it's just a stupid fish"

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
I would start by testing your Nitrate and Phosphates levels in the water column. With the bioload you have combined with O+ caps, I would be surprised if you needed more Macros.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
1 - 6 of 6 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top