I do see that Seachem Flourish comes in Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium, would using all three together be a good idea to make up for what Flourish Comp does not give?
Glut will supply the Co2 plants need to out compete the algae for ferts.Glutaraldehyde definitely can help. But it is a remedy, not a solution
Ferts, with the exception of Ammonia do not cause algae. Having in imbalance between light, ferts, co2 and plant growth will create the ideal scenario for algae..
Your intention is correct, but let me add something. Glutaraldehyde does not provide CO2. It provides another source of carbon, in the form of a photosynthetic intermediate.Glut will supply the Co2 plants need to out compete the algae for ferts.
Agree almost with everything. Strengthen the plants and algae is under control, all great.Aiming towards strengthening the plants will help them to out compete the algae. Thus algae will be under control. Algae is always present.
So do not count the algae that is on the glass of the tank? My understanding is that there is bad and good algae. The algae film on the glass is good algae and some fish like to eat it.Agree almost with everything. Strengthen the plants and algae is under control, all great.
But always present? Well, if we are considering one GSA dot, or something like that, technically yes. But as general thing, no, not always present. BGA, BBA, Staghorn, hair algae.. no. Something is not correct. Algae should not be there to the point it is easily visible. Well balanced tanks have very very little or none.
You are free to make your distinctions between algae. If that helps you, then by all means, do it.So do not count the algae that is on the glass of the tank? My understanding is that there is bad and good algae. The algae film on the glass is good algae and some fish like to eat it.
Well I don't agree! I know of other's that don't agree either.You are free to make your distinctions between algae. If that helps you, then by all means, do it.
idk, im thinking he has made a very valid point :nerd: And with his Tom Barr example, as an example, he is correct. IMO some people have algae in their tanks for some reason such as feeding their fish. (on purpose.) Others who consider it a nuisance, in this case Junior, believe to my understanding and agreement, that it is a sign of something being off. Almost a natural reminder. my Long nano tank doesn't have a spec of algae in it, I can assure this. I've witnessed my shrimp starve (not saying that's why im saying there's no algae) because there isn't any algae. I've looked to see, and to my excitement there wasn't, and still isn't. They mostly scavenge on either, leftovers, or... more leftovers... Now im my other tank, not the same story lolWell I don't agree! I know of other's that don't agree either.
*slowly claps* to much ethos there buddy.I run the 3rd largest maintenance company in the United States. We run 13 trucks now... and in my professional opinion I have to say that your statement about a balance aquarium having zero algae is wrong..