The Planted Tank Forum banner

My Planted Shrimp Tank Method/theory (almost no WC)

25286 Views 72 Replies 15 Participants Last post by  pejerrey
7
Hello all,

I just wanted to share my humble experience and I hope to learn more and more, most I consider knowledge but there may be some belief mixed in. There is plenty of examples of shrimp keeping/breeding out there, this is just mine and doesn't negate other methods nor I pretend to present this info as "the right way to do it".

*This thread refers to my 30 gallon main tank with medium light, pressurized CO2 24/7 and lean Ferts.

**got destroyed when I was away by my housemate:icon_evil, so this is history.

Disclaimer: I want to say that there is not much evidence of CO2 24/7 been better for cardinias vs timed, I do it just because some successful shrimp keepers/breeders do it, its my belief. Same with how much ferts and WC. This is my personal approach.

This tank had a LOT of surface agitation, thus very good oxygenation/atmospheric gas exchange 24/7.

It's between 65-70F so its colder than a tropical planted tank and is PH 5.6, very acidic. I believe colder water favors the retention of CO2/O2 and acidic PH encourages photosynthesis, therefore I can get away with injecting little CO2 in comparison with a hotter/alkaline tank with the same light. Seems like Algae is also kept easier under control in a colder tank.



plants:
blyxa japonica
lobelia cardinalis
assorted mosses
anubias nana petite
rotala vietnam
rotala mexicana
hygrophilia pinnatifida
ALTERNANTHERA REINECKII
Myriophyllum matogrossense
hydrocotyle verticillata
Ludwigia x lacustris
Hygroryza aristata
cryptocoryne balansae
Cryptocoryne wendtii 'Tropica'
Limnophila Mini

The family shot:


I kept CRS SS, CBS SSS, OEBTs and blue velvets. CRS and CBS were breeding, I had a bunch of babies but OEBTs and neos were not I think because of the low PH (5.5)


**(I also have a 6gallon almost non dosing, non co2 which has a different method that includes more often WC)**



Here is the intro:

Once upon a time.... when I had a "planted tropical fish tank"....






I was totally clueless about how I was keeping my tank lush as I was just following directions from my favorite LFS to dose and plant. Yes, I was buying liquid ferts from them. One day, the guy who always helped me left that LFS and had to deal with a new guy. He tried pushing a new set of ferts and a HO light on me, when I heard the price, I got a bit skeptical and I ended up buying the light bulbs only. Things went really wrong then, algae wrong. I came back for the ferts and I aldo got some puffers... and things got super really wrong then, mega algae bloom wrong. And then, just then I started searching for help online.

This is how I started here:


I met The Planted Tank forum and SFBAAPS!! yay! people here helped me out figure that my co2 had run out....DOH! lol! :D ...at the same time some gurus like Hoppy, Plantbrain, Youjettisonme, Speedie, Ralph G. and others helped me realize that I needed to know more about what in the heck was in my water and what and why I was dosing ferts. The last two got me into shrimp tho!

The adventure began.

Here is the thing:

I started by buying dry ferts and trying PPSpro (perpetual preservation system) as it was in grams and allowed me (IMO) to calculate and understand better what I was dosing... I ended up just shooting for Estimative Index (Tom's EI) recommended ppm levels and I cranked the co2 to the max, mainly after understanding the law of the minimum (It states that growth is controlled not by the total amount of resources available, but by the scarcest resource (limiting factor).)

Once I got rid of all limiting factors I started to pay attn to my testings before and after every fertilization. There was an obvious pattern of consumption and build up. It was a simple subtraction. For example: I had 20ppm of NO3 to start and I had only 5 left. Therefore I assumed that if I was using 15ppm of NO3, then I should dose that only.I did the same calculation with everything else. And If I wanted to use less (have less concentration in the water column) then I needed to have less light. I shortened the photo-period and sure enough the consumption diminished, therefore I had more buildup.

I played around with this for a while, in the meantime I always had my co2 all the way up, so that wasn't the limiting factor (because is the most important) without co2 plants cant use the available nutrients, algae can. Same with ant other leftover from any other limiting factor. When I played around dosing very lean there was plenty of light and plenty of CO2, instead of getting mostly algae, I would get mostly plant deficiencies, this showed me how important is co2 in a planted tank.

Side note: Around this time I started getting very interested in only shrimp tanks, I bought an established 6 gallon with a nice Neocardinia colony from Youjettisonme that came with a lot of teachings and wise advice.:thumbsup:

This is how it ended up after all those experiments, before I decided to convert it to an only shrimp tank set up:



The main thing, IME was to keep the proportions. PMDD (poor man's daily drops) and PPSpro had it already figured out. As i had already mixed PPSpro solutions, I kept using that.

I ended up dosing to have only about 5ppm of NO3 in the water as I planned to keep High Grade Shrimp (cardinias) and they are nitrate, nitrite and ammonia sensitive (I believe what I'm told here). So I dose PPS pro daily to keep those values at the with the least CO2 possible. To reach that I did the following:

Around 04-10-12 I re-started the tank with inert substrate, planted it heavily and set the timer for 10hr light. Full Co2. Filter was already cycled for about... 8yrs (lol) and I added a new huge canister that would house more nitro bacteria. All plants were covered in biofilm as well as the back glass of the tank as scraped the other 3 (not sure if scraping the glass kills its biofilm).

This is how it looked fresh right after shrimptank set up:



I started dosing as mentioned above to have 5ppm of NO3 spread on 7 days, that means like 0.7 a day and I used this calculator to figure that (http://calc.petalphile.com/). I dose daily because I learned and believe that sensitive shrimp prefer stable conditions and dosing daily is easier on their lil tails.

I waited until I started seen the deficiencies to start I shortening the photoperiod. This would slow down the tank metabolism and the nutrient deficiencies will improve in theory. Once it was all good (8hrs), I started lowering the co2 until I got to 1 bubble per 3 sec, and then like several months later some GSA in my spraybar, so I increased to 1bps, that stopped it.

note: BPS is not a measure that works the same in all tanks it is a very specific of a single tank arbitrary way to eyeball how much co2 is going into the tank. Also, measuring CO2 by using the PH/KH chart is also a pretty inaccurate way to adjust co2, the best way is knowing your plant/algae response

The whole figuring out this set up's right metabolism to keep my water quality stable took me about two months since i started this Planted Shrimp Tank, which is what I was gonna wait anyways before bringing in the shrimpanzes.

I knew that I wanted to keep my TDS low, under 200. I decided to change water at 170-200tds. Guess what! I never reached that. If I hadn't cleaned my canister then I would be in month #5 without a WC, and I probably will have several months ahead without the need for a WC.

The whole idea is that plants are another filter that keep the water quality very well. Therefore very few to no water changes are needed In this theory.... it would not be possible with few plants and mostly moss tho, in theory/method...

Another way to look at this is: If I start with DI water, zero TDS, and I start adding the nutrients I want to have in ppms, I would end up with about 130pmm total maximum. The tank was always under 150 TDS, I had to buy mosura TDS UP to reach 160-170TDS for my OEBTs.

How come I dont have to change water? well, water evaporates pure so I only top off with DI water wich is pure. toping off with tap adds buildup that doesnt evaporate. Calcium/magnesium doesnt evaporate and is used just a lil bit by the plants and bugs so can be considered a constant once is there. Nutrients are consumed by the plants and If i see that my TDS is marking a bit high, I skip dosing a couple of days and test again. Usually that brings it down like 5ppm. Feeding is lean with shrimp like every other day about half a pea size in food that is designed to not foul the water quality. I trim the plants once or twice a month, that takes out waste / nutrients out of the water in the form of a plant. And finally I overfilter the tank, I have two canisters running a DIY UGF and a big sponge in their intakes.



I don't know about the UGF lasting forever. I won't last forever myself! Lol! :) I may have to start over in 2-3 years because i will move out for sure and I hope that it would work that long. The substrate is akadama drl large grain (1") in the bottom 3 inches and small grain (1/4") from 1" to 3" which makes the whole thing 4" to 6"

One thing that is key in this kind of set up is to know that is not a plant farm. Plants grow slow or just get stuck and look good but there is not much happening. For example blyxa doesnt grow but roots ok and stays the same. In the other hand red cabomba for example didnt do good at all but I'm not sure if the PH was the main reason for it to fade away. PH is 5.5ish in this tank. So I recommend to buy plants that are already looking good because they may grow really slow and it will take time to fill up spaces in between. Plant tight. :)


There is a few things I forgot to mention, I will just point them out here:

• nutrient consumption varies a bit, I assume it's because of the plant growth/mass, some deaths or rotting stuff.
• I created a LOT of surface agitation with the spray bar, no splashing tho. I think this is critical with co2 injection 24/7.
• You can't see it in the picture but I have at least 1/3 of the surface covered by floating plants, shrimps hang out a lot there nibbling in their roots.
• I'm generous with Indian almond leaves.
• I feed them every other day alternating 13 different high end shrimp foods and fresh blanched organic zuchini/spinach.

See my surface agitation and floaters:
http://youtu.be/d1wmeaC4P0c

I recommend the following reading/links:

-(post #1) as a must for all people starting in the hobby of shrimp keeping by Youjettisonme
: http://www.plantedtank.net/forums/showthread.php?t=176557

-Setting up a Shrimp tank and DIY UGF (like mine) by Mordalphus : http://aquarliam.com/2012/02/setting-up-a-shrimp-tank/

-CO2: why some tanks might need more CO2 than others and why some folks gas their fish by Tom Barr: http://www.barrreport.com/showthrea...than-others-and-why-some-folks-gas-their-fish

-Dosing fertilizers with Freshwater Shrimp, by Ryan wood @ Planet Inverts: http://www.planetinverts.com/Dosing Fertilizers with Shrimp.html

Other examples of high grade cardinias in planted tanks with ferts and co2:

Plantbrain
: http://www.barrreport.com/showthread.php/5068-EI-dosing-with-Crystal-Red-shrimp-over-a-year

Youjettisonme: http://plantedtank.net/forums/showthread.php?t=167472

YU CRS CENTER (top notch Taiwanese breeders): http://youtu.be/sVjYLHlOQqM

En español(Chile): http://www.acuaristas.cl/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=93366

Trusted Sources:

My Shrimp Dealer, Speedie: http://www.plantedtank.net/forums/showthread.php?t=161792&highlight=speedie+shrimp

MY Shrimp Food/suplements Dealer, H4n: http://mail.plantedtank.net/forums/showthread.php?t=183859

MY Plant Dealers, H4n and Plantbrain: http://mail.plantedtank.net/forums/showthread.php?t=152439

http://www.plantedtank.net/forums/member.php?tab=visitor_messaging&u=1333&page=3

My Fertilizer Dealers, GLA: http://greenleafaquariums.com/aquarium-fertilizer.html

:bounce:

••••Appendix 1, A deeper explanation on stable TDS••••

"no water changes? What?"

-USING A TDS METER.

This is the most important tool, without it is a guessing game and this is like an exact Science kinda game.

I need to measure total dissolved solids every day or two when the tank is running at "idle". Without this info it's impossible to determine if the method is working or not.

Simple example:
One gallon of zero TDS water.

I need ~120ppm of GH (6dGh) for the inverts, and I know that to reach that we need to add GH booster. The booster is not just GH so it would probably bring the TDS to 140-150 depending on the brand.

Now I have clean water with enough GH at 150TDS. (120ppm of calcium + magnesium and other stuff)

I allow ~10-20tds(ppm) to fit all nutrients, micros and macros. (very exaggerated) .

Now i have ~ 170 TDS maximum for clean nutritious water.

I can set up a maximum tolerance of 200 TDS (which is pretty conservative) and skip/lower dosing when the TDS are above 180TDS.

A few days ago I reached 185 TDS, I've stopped dosing and now after 3 days I'm back at 180 TDS and I hope to get to 175 TDS soon.


- INERT SUBSTRATE.

While having an active substrate is tempting, at least in this case, I choose to use an inert substrate for more accuracy when measuring how much does this tank "eat".

The nutrients in an active substrate slowly deplete, making it difficult to dose always the same because this inconsistency.

-MEDIUM TO HIGH LIGHT AND CO2.

I have tried doing this with non co2 tanks and it seems to be impossible to me to handle a nutrient buildup of some sort, even when skipping ferts.

A quicker metabolism, as with more light intensity and co2 injection, allows quicker consumption of nutrients, therefore it's easier to dose accordingly to the bioload and the plant consumption.

-DRY FERTILIZERS.

Commercial brands are not going to disclose their mixes. Figuring out how to dose with seachem or Ada liquid fertilizers for this purpose would be very challenging.
Dry dosing is more customizable, with the help of a number of online calculators i can make my own solutions... Literally, but pps-pro or pmdd work fine as well for me.

-LEAN TO NO LIVESTOCK.

The advantage to this is the control over waste and nitrogen compounds.

I can always add more kno3 for my plant needs but the only way to dilute a buildup would be to change water thus making no sense with the method.

Inverts is the way to go to start doing this.

-GOOD FILTRATION.

The whole point on using filters is to improve water quality, by over filtering a tank with this method we are just making it easier as the water won't get stagnate, there would be no scum pockets/film, better co2 distribution and very good oxygenation if a spray bar is used to move the surface.

-HEAVILY PLANTED from day one.

I don't want to give algae a chance.

More plants will be able to process more nutrients/waste and therefore better water quality. A lot of the beneficial bacteria (biofilm) is already in the plants.

NO TAP WATER!

Tap water has stuff in it, maybe good if im changing water but not in this case. Every time i top off with tap, i add TDS to the tank.

It's a must to use deionized (zero tds)
or at least RO water.

Blank canvas. Same as substrate.

••••Appendix 2, about short photoperiod••••

"4 hrs light? What?? 2on,3off,2on,17off??"


Been that light is the most important driving force in dictating the "metabolism" of a tank, adjusting it will dictate what method can/should be applied.

I'm convinced that same plants could be grown with less intense light with a longer photoperiod and maybe less nutrients/co2.

I have powerful lights in this tank, 2x T5HO 22" (~50PAR @ substrate level). If I have a longer photoperiod I would need more concentration of available nutrients and co2. This conflicts with what is believed to be good for cardinias shrimp.

So, for the plants to process the available nutrients without a higher concentration of co2 I need a shorter photoperiod with this lights. If I want a longer photoperiod, I will need more co2 (or raise the fixture which would look ugly) to outcompete algae. Nutrients will be processed either way, it's just a matter of who has better conditions, plants or algae.

The general consensus is that algae issues are a consequence of lack of co2. From my point of view is caused by excess of light, therefore the need for more co2.

BBA tells me: "hey! Got to much light going on!"

As I can't (or don't want) dose more co2, I must reduce the amount of light. And as I don't want to raise the light fixture to reduce its intensity, then I must shorten the photoperiod.

I hope this is clear enough.
:)

••••••


I think that is all I wanted to share for now, I'll keep adding.... as I said before most of it is stuff I learned and some is stuff I believe. I may be leaving things out or unclear but I will be happy to fix that. Please don't take this as a PRO guide, is just a synthesis of my journal. Just one guy with a couple of tanks experience.

Does all of this make sense? If there is assumptions I made into beliefs, I would love to learn more so please don't hesitate to teach me something new, I'm just a passionate newbie and "Ego is not your Amigo".

;)
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 1
1 - 20 of 73 Posts
Very thorough and well written.
Thank you Kiran, I just saw some typos so I will correct them later. Keep in mind that English is my second language :D lol!
Haha, I wouldn't even know it!
How come I dont have to change water? well, water evaporates pure so I only top off with DI water wich is pure. toping off with tap adds buildup that doesnt evaporate. Calcium/magnesium doesnt evaporate and is used just a lil bit by the plants and bugs so can be considered a constant once is there. Nutrients are consumed by the plants and If i see that my TDS is marking a bit high, I skip dosing a couple of days and test again. Usually that brings it down like 5ppm. Feeding is lean with shrimp like every other day about half a pea size in food that is designed to not foul the water quality. I trim the plants once or twice a month, that takes out waste / nutrients out of the water in the form of a plant.
I like the idea that you do not have to change water. And your explanation makes sense.


And finally I overfilter the tank, I have two canisters running a DIY UGF and a big sponge in their intakes.
Can you keep your DIY UGF running forever without have to tear it down for cleaning?

BTW, how did you create your DIY UGF?
+1 with what Kiran said. I like how it is written to teach others but also gives examples and first hand experience.
Nice write up, but I'm still a bit skeptical about planting shrimp. ;)
Thanks guys, I forgot to add that I keep CRS SS, CBS SSS, OEBTs and blue velvets(neos).
CRS and CBS are breeding, bunch of babies! :)
OEBTs and neos are not and I assume it is because the ph is 5.5.
Oh I don't know about the UGF lasting forever. I may have to start over in 2-3 years because i will move out for sure and I hope that it would work that long. The substrate is akadama drl large grain (1") in the bottom 3 inches and small grain (1/4") from 1" to 3" which makes the whole thing 4" to 6"

I followed Liam's instructions to make it out of PVC pipes. I made a "square 8" shaped loop to help prevent clogging from a dead end.
The whole idea is that plants are another filter that keep the water quality very well. Therefore very few to no water changes are needed In this theory/method.
@pejerrey what is your native language?
Spanish from Chile, castellano. Why?
Oh cool! My native lenguage is spanish too. I. Will send you a message : )
There is a few things I forgot to mention, I will edit the first post soon:
• nutrient consumption varies a bit, I assume it's because of the plant growth/mass, some deaths or rotting stuff.
• I created a LOT of surface agitation with the spray bar, no splashing tho. I think this is critical with co2 injection 24/7.
• You can't see it in the picture but I have at least 1/3 of the surface covered by floating plants, shrimps hang out a lot there nibbling in their roots.
• I'm generous with Indian almond leaves.
• I feed them every other day alternating 13 different high end shrimp foods and fresh blanched organic zuchini/spinach.
Love it! I'm looking at starting a shrimp tank so I love reading about other peoples' experiences with them!!
Love it! I'm looking at starting a shrimp tank so I love reading about other peoples' experiences with them!!
I hope is somewhat helpful. :)
So why no go whole hog and not use Excel or CO2 at all?
Then you do not even dose.

You just feed.

I'd say the CO2/Excel stuff in far more detrimental than the dosing.
I had 10 to 20X more brood production in a non CO2 enriched system than a CO2 enriched system. Others have reported similar brood production differences.
That's not small potatoes.

I've yet to find any issue with NO3 or dosing and shrimp over the last few years I've had a wide range of shrimp. Shrimp will respond to water changes with a molt, but lower light, sediment based ferts, wood/tannins etc, then CO2 is easy and with good current= good O2, you can easily get away, at least most can, with once a month water changes or longer.

So simply slowing things down with light, makes CO2 and algae issues much easier and extends the water change much better than testing and dosing daily. Or use low light + non CO2..then you are down to fish and shrimp waste being able to supply most of the plant needs.

All methods grow plants, the difference is at what rate.
All methods are constrained by Liebig's Law as well, so we can limited via nutrients, or CO2 or light or balance all 3.......to get the desired level of routine for our goal. It is more holistic to approach this from the big three, rather than just one facet and would yield a more robust method, since the goal here is stability.
Testing can help if you are doing it just a bit or to reduce the dosing/WC scheduling.... but needs done well, adding the CO2/light into this mix will make that more robust and easier to apply.

I try to tell folks the virtues of non CO2 tank methods, so does Diana Walstad, but folks love the dope: CO2 gas :icon_cool

I change the water on my 70 Gal about once a month now that the grass filled in. I dose about 2x a week. About 1/4 EI, less I get diatoms and brown algae, more, I'll need to do more water changes. I can eyeball the plants and algae to know when to dose, but over the years of keeping plants etc, these end up being the best test kits there are.

Try non CO2 and see how the brood production does for you.
It's night and day for me and I saw it with several types of shrimp, not just Fires or CRS.
See less See more
2
Here's a CPVC grid I made about 25 -30 years ago:





If you run these reverse flow, they will never clog in a planted tank or a fine sand tank.

A small burp hole is added near the top of the surface for the incoming prefiltered water.
See less See more
I'm interested to see your results. I would also like another test afterwards to see if 1-2 water changes a week is beneficial to a tank that doesn't need water changes :)
Hey Tom!

I have another tank (6gal) where I don't use co2 at all and for a while I didn't dose at all but plants show deficiencies like te yellowind and loosing of lower leaves, pinholes and stagnation/dwarf new growth. I started dosing and things have improved in te new growth. It's low light so I never really had algae worries. However there is a point where there is no more improvement and I see a bit more algae on the glass and I assumed that was when the limiting factor was co2. I believe. I just measured build up an there was still deficiencies and some algae started showing (oh, a bit of thread algae also). My next step is injecting co2 in this tank.

I know 2 people that breed cardinias both injecting co2 24/7, I thought that I was on the safe side by doing that. However, most people believe and assure that co2 diminishes breeding. That said, I'm not a breeder. I just want to have nie planted tanks and high grade shrimp. Seems that to have shrimp is an excuse for having ugly tanks.

I know the light in the tank in question in this thread (30gal)
Algae will come with no co2 and there will be deficiencies without dosing, feeding an waste is not enough as there is no much PO4 in it. As I stated in the first post, I've been trying all combinations in this tank. However, I'm increasing the dosing a lil bit at the time (2 drops) but the $600+ in shrimp I have in there make me be prudent. (50PAR at substrate level)

That UGF you are showing there is exactly what I did in this tank, can I use the pics as an example if people ask me how? The only difference is that mine is like an 8 only, you have a couple more pipes in the middle there.

I'm interested on trying te reversed flow in my next set up for sure, I went to the library to read more about flora in wetlands and I read a couple of times the links you provided in a similar topic. I found that the book you cited is only available at uc berkeley's library and to buy it is like $200.... Although im curious that is a bit out of my reach.

Now I know that Phosphate can be made available for the plants in the substrate as lomg as its not disturbed (if I understood), but I don't know how much does an UGF affects that.

Side note: As I understand you are going for a phd on botany right? I would like to have a little chat about that if you don't mind because I'm trying to make up my mind on academic paths.

Thanks for checking this out.

Edit, lol! Yes, i like co2, guess who got me hooked? Remember that radio show not that long ago? ;)

http://m.blogtalkradio.com/aquabotanic/2012/03/17/aqua-botanic-c02-in-the-planted-aquarium-with-tom-barr


This is where I got the idea of using UGF to make co2 available for plant roots also. I mean, it was my own interpretation of the availability of co2 in under substrate water in natural conditions. Lol! my logic was to make co2 available to the roots also but mainly I did it following the practice of known breeders to stabilize PH swings, at the time i didnt know about reversed flow tho.
See less See more
1 - 20 of 73 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top