Put your money into the regulator. You can build a DIY reactor. then just get a timer and drop checker
What?????? Have you ever used pressurized co2??? You also forgot the most critical part of the system which is the needle valve.Don't waste your money on a $$ regulator.
If you have a decent CO2 reactor you just need a cheap solenoid/regulator and sequence it with a timer. For example dose for 30 minutes when first turned on in the morning, then 5 minutes once every hour until the lights go off.
That's not how this works....That's not how any of this works......Don't waste your money on a $$ regulator.
If you have a decent CO2 reactor you just need a cheap solenoid/regulator and sequence it with a timer. For example dose for 30 minutes when first turned on in the morning, then 5 minutes once every hour until the lights go off.
lolThat's not how this works....That's not how any of this works......
Come on, at least use airline tubing so you don't spill water everywhere...Say what!!!!!
You don't even need a regulator just put the CO2 tank inside your aquarium and open the main valve.
Did I win?
Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
I've seen some bad advice on this site over the years, but this is by far the worst.Like I said cheapo regulator and needle valve - costs about $50 bucks online. I have had this setup for 3+ years on a 120 gal.
I've seen some bad advice on this site over the years, but this is by far the worst.
Regulators and solenoids are the last thing in this hobby that I'd cheap out on. The money you'd save will quickly be negated by all of the fish you kill.
I'm actually inclined to agree with the theory behind this one... Think about a bell diffuser, charge it and let it disolve, a reactor is basically the same thing only with something swirling the water around. It doesn't matter how accurately you fill it, as long as it's full. If you run the co2 too long, the reactor will over fill and extra co2 will blow out the return line to the atmosphere. Under fill it and there's no harm either. Fill it the right amount and you're fine.While I agree you need precise control if you are using a bubbler or diffuser - it is not neccessary for a CO2 reactor and there is no value added from a expensive dual stage reg. Many single stage regulators have a decent needle valve that can be used to dial down the release rate into a 5-10 bps range. Then you can use a digital timer to dose the CO2 in bursts just a few minutes long into the reactor. Keep in mind that a reactor is so efficient that it will deliver the same CO2 levels at probably 10x less CO2 consumption rates than a diffuser or bubbler. So I needed a better way for limiting CO2 delivery rates than what you suggest. On my 100 gal setup 50 lbs CO2 tank lasts 12-14 months.
![]()
Exactly. With an unrestricted output on the reactor the excess CO2 goes out as large bubbles in case of any malfunction. This has happened a couple of times on my reactor and there was no surge in tank levels. This is completely different than what you see in a diffuser or lily pipe system where excess. With that said a good DIY reactor for $50 is a better spend than the $300-500 on a shiny regulator-not only is it safer but your CO2 supply will last a lot longer.If you run the co2 too long, the reactor will over fill and extra co2 will blow out the return line to the atmosphere. Under fill it and there's no harm either. Fill it the right amount and you're fine.
Not more money, but there is a line where the cost is so low that the reg is probably garbage. I have a $100 Azoo regulator. You don't need a great reg, but you need one that will hold steady levels.Exactly. With an unrestricted output on the reactor the excess CO2 goes out as large bubbles in case of any malfunction. This has happened a couple of times on my reactor and there was no surge in tank levels. This is completely different than what you see in a diffuser or lily pipe system where excess. With that said a good DIY reactor for $50 is a better spend than the $300-500 on a shiny regulator-not only is it safer but your CO2 supply will last a lot longer.
A second safety feature is to put the reactor circulation pump on the same timer as the CO2. This way both the pump and the CO2 solenoid need to be on together in order for CO2 to be absorbed. If the solenoid gets stuck open (extremely unlikely event) even then the pump will remain off and prevent CO2 absorption.
I know I am going against dogma but not everyone is ready to adopt a new approach and is too eager to believe more money = better results.
BTW - I do know what I am talking about - Chemistry PhD and more than a decade experience building chemical process plants. CO2 absorption towers are well known and proven design for liquid-gas exchange.
I agree with you on the prices you mentioned - $100-200 is reasonable. In my defense - my reg+solenoid is five years old (pure generic) and bought from fleabay for $50. So far working flawlessly. I have seen prices for regulators marketed to the hobby in the $300+ range which I think is really sad that someone might think that they have to spend that much to get into a high tech setup.You need to regulate the co2 input through the use of a good needle valve and regulator. Please do not say that a regulator is $300 to $500, There is a member on this forum that sells amazing regs for only $200. Even Aquatek and Azoo ($100 range) are better than having a $50 regulator and uncontrolled co2 input.