A question comes to mind when I reread this. While it is always good to get the most accurate reading, what plan do you have for using /needing a truly accurate reading? Since my need for an accurate reading would be based on the health of my fish and plants, I would think those come with lots of variables that make having a truly accurate reading less needed. Other than the comfort of knowing the CO2 is a at a specific level, I would still use the fish/plant health as the real factor to watch.
Am I missing the real point of having an accurate reading?
Well, once you have an excellent example or better yet, several excellent examples................of nice health, healthy fish, no algae issues, great plant growth with a wide range of species, then you measure..........and do so carefully.
Unfortunately hobbbyists only test when something is WRONG.
There may be 101 reasons something is wrong, but if you measure when things are right, you have a baseline, so you can rule that out.
Some tanks might require 70ppm CO2, others, 45ppm.
This is also good information because it shows that not all tanks are perfect if they have a drop checker that says 30ppm.
Also, what are the CO2 levels at night time?
Is 20 ppm optimal for nighttime fish? No, not likely, so this shows there is a room for improvement for the system, degassing at night time. I added a wet/dry filter after measuring this and O2 levels to all my tanks.
I think your comment is fine for many, but if you want to learn more and improve, measuring O2 and CO2 may teach you a lot more.