Joined
·
8 Posts
Hello everyone, today I would like to ask the viability of an idea I had regarding effective growth of plants that require CO2 most of the time to thrive, such as HC.
Soon, I will be dry starting my 20 gallon long which I aim to make my first planted tank. Now, I have had experience with reef aquariums for quite a long time in the past, and I had based this on an idea occasionally used in reef aquariums.
Assuming I dry start HC and start with about 15 pots, it will spread in quite a short amount of time (approximately 3 weeks by my estimate). After I fill the tank is the idea, however. If I held off on adding life other than HC and e. tenellus and blasted CO2 for 12 hours daily at 6-7 bps for about 2-3 weeks along with EI dosing and high light (30" planted+ on about 10 inches to substrate), with 50-60% water changes weekly, would the plants be much better established than if I was to use normal rates? I can see this being an option which greatly improves plant health in theory, although it might be different in actual application. What do you all think about this?
Soon, I will be dry starting my 20 gallon long which I aim to make my first planted tank. Now, I have had experience with reef aquariums for quite a long time in the past, and I had based this on an idea occasionally used in reef aquariums.
Assuming I dry start HC and start with about 15 pots, it will spread in quite a short amount of time (approximately 3 weeks by my estimate). After I fill the tank is the idea, however. If I held off on adding life other than HC and e. tenellus and blasted CO2 for 12 hours daily at 6-7 bps for about 2-3 weeks along with EI dosing and high light (30" planted+ on about 10 inches to substrate), with 50-60% water changes weekly, would the plants be much better established than if I was to use normal rates? I can see this being an option which greatly improves plant health in theory, although it might be different in actual application. What do you all think about this?