No surprise to me that your post has fallen on deaf ears. The primary trend in the discussion that happens on this forum is clearly to maintain the status quo and squelch out competing thoughts to the established systems. Probably to be expected since the research-minded tend to peruse research rather than post on ideological internet forums.
Engaging around here really seems to do no good.
Any allelopathic chemical would have to be an organic molecule, not inorganic, simply because organisms don't, as far as I know, manufacture inorganic compounds. Organic molecules are large molecules, easily removed from water with activated carbon. So, a good test for whether or not a planted tank is free of algae because of allelopathy by the plants would be to filter the tank water with activated carbon and watch the plants to see if an algae bloom results. The strong argument against allelopathy in planted tanks is that this has been tried by several people, with no algae blooms resulting.
A test of that type doesn't mean there are no species of plants that use allelopathy against algae, just that in a typical algae-free planted tank, no one has been able to show by this test that allelopathy is occurring.
Those papers about allelopathy do say the evidence of allelopathy was found, but for specific species only. We, who don't believe that allelopathy is a factor in our planted tanks, believe that it hasn't yet been shown that the species of algae and the species of plants we use are involved in such a relationship.
I don't believe there is the slightest chance that any of us wish to stifle anyone's ideas about how to avoid algae, given that algae is probably the single biggest problem we all encounter.