KH2PO4 Solution - The Planted Tank Forum
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 3 (permalink) Old 02-08-2010, 11:40 PM Thread Starter
Wannabe Guru
 
barbarossa4122's Avatar
 
PTrader: (19/100%)
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Forest Hills, NY
Posts: 1,473
KH2PO4 Solution

Hi,

I made KH2PO4 solution from dry PO4 from Aquariumfertilizer and I have a Q: each ml of this solution gives me 0.53ppm for 10 gallons of water. Now, how much do I need to dose (3 times per week) my 55g to get a consistent 2ppm of PO4 in my tank? Thank you.

My calculations are 20ml 3 times a week but, I am not sure if this is correct.

"Ich Hatte Einen Kameraden"
barbarossa4122 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 3 (permalink) Old 02-10-2010, 02:41 PM
Children Boogie
 
mistergreen's Avatar
 
PTrader: (13/100%)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 16,743
lets see

.53 / 5.5 = .0963 ppm / ml on solution in a 55G

x = 2/.0963 = 20.768ppm

that looks right.. Just to let you know that keeping parameters consistent isn't probable. It depends on a lot of variables. That's why the EI method is used; it overdoses the nutrients just in case of any deficiencies.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
mistergreen is offline  
post #3 of 3 (permalink) Old 02-10-2010, 05:05 PM
Planted Tank Guru
 
plantbrain's Avatar
 
PTrader: (267/100%)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The swamp
Posts: 13,609
Graphically:



the region "D" is the target range.
C works okay too, but has much less wiggle room, you want to dose more as you start hitting that concentration.

CO2 and light also have similar curves.
For nutrients, we do not know what the E ranges are for plants, mostly salt stress are the cases that are known. Hoagland's solution has anywhere between 210-235ppm of N for example, 50ppm or thereabouts for PO4 etc.

This is often used as a non limit reference for growth studies.
So it's very safe to say plants can handle a wide upper range beyond most even the more serious mistakes folks often make without risk.

Still, hitting the concentration range of D is far easier than say B or C which are far narrower/much harder to maintain from a management perspective.
Also, if you strongly limit a nutrient, say PO4, then the CO2 demand also goes down because the PO4 is more limiting than say CO2 might be.

This dependence leads some to think there's more to nutrients at lower limiting levels than is really the case. When the nutrients are independent, then demand goes up. Likewise, if the light is more intense, then the demand for CO2 and nutrients also goes up. But if you do not add more CO2/nutrients, then such light is wasted and cannot be used for growth.

Likewise, the non limiting nutrients allow the light and CO2 to be fully used.
If you do not have good CO2, then the light is also not fully used at peak efficiency.

So a combo of low light, good CO2 and good nutrients along with sediment nutrients gives the best overall management for most aquarist' plant growing goals.

Regards,
Tom Barr




Regards,
Tom Barr
plantbrain is offline  
Reply

Tags
None

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the The Planted Tank Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome