29 gallon lighting question
Planted Tank Forums
Your Tanks Image Hosting *Tank Tracker * Plant Profiles Fish Profiles Planted Tank Guide Photo Gallery Articles

Go Back   The Planted Tank Forum > General Planted Tank Forums > General Planted Tank Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-28-2004, 11:24 PM   #1
Blade
Algae Grower
 
PTrader: (0/0%)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Oregon
Posts: 139
Default

29 gallon lighting question


Right now I have 2 20W T8's and 1 attci blue 13W T5 for my Heavily Planted 29gallon. I have room for an additional 13W T5 light. As of now I have 1.8WPG the additional 13W would take me to almost 2.3WPG. Will this additional amount make enough of a difference to justify the additional funds. I am setting up a two 55 gallons right now and would like to concentrate putting money into those for the time being. However I really like my 29gallon and I want to be able to try as many plant types as possible. It currently has a Nutrafin Co2 canister.


Also does the blue have any affects I need to be aware of. I used it because it really enhances the color of my Cardinal Tetras as well as some of the plants. I wouldn't mind going with another blue if I did an the additional light.

The T8's are Lifeglow2's. Basic white light I guess.
Blade is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 07-28-2004, 11:33 PM   #2
corigan
Planted Tank Enthusiast
 
corigan's Avatar
 
PTrader: (0/0%)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 683
Default

Acitinics are made for corals and not for plants. They are really not doing much of anything for your plants, I wouldn't even put them into the ratio of how much WPG you have. I would definately try to add another 13w T5 and change the actinic to a 13w T5 somewhere in the rank of 5-10k. That would put you in the range 66w, a much better range to be able to handle some plant growth. Those T5's are pretty bright as well. A good reflector will make them even more effective. I would try to make sure they have decent reflectors, and if at all possible even to get bulbs that have built in reflectors in them.

I know how it is trying to set up multiple tanks and having the funds to do everything I would want on them. One thing I've learned on planted tanks, don't cut corners. IMHO, I would hook your 29g up with better (proper) lighting before concentrating on other tanks. 2.3 wpg will be decent when all the bulbs benefit the plants. Also it will utilize that co2. As for right now the co2 is probably being more detremental than beneficial due to the lack of lighting. You will open up the ability to grow more species of plants once you up your lighting.

Matt
__________________
Member #6 of the Eheim Pimp Club - 2 Eheim 2213 & 2215 w/ surface extractor, LiquidDoser and Auto Feeder.
corigan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2004, 12:18 AM   #3
meee
Algae Grower
 
PTrader: (0/0%)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 59
Default

from wat ive learned in biology, plants grow best in the red and blue spectrum of lighting, so i would think that the blue lights would actually be kinda helpful. i would get another opinion though, because i could be wrong.
meee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2004, 12:32 AM   #4
steven
Algae Grower
 
PTrader: (1/100%)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Georgia
Posts: 113
Default

I have no personal experience with the bulbs that have built-in reflectors, but I would avoid them based on the data collected here:

http://www.thekrib.com/Lights/intensity.html#1

He basically found that a built in reflector causes very little improvement (around 2%) when installed with NO EXTERNAL REFLECTOR, the scenario in which you would expect the most benefit. However, when installed in an external reflector (as I assume most of us are doing), the built in reflector actually signifigantly REDUCED the bulb's output since the built in reflector effectively blocked the upper 180 of the bulb's light from reaching the external reflector.
steven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2004, 03:34 PM   #5
malkore
Planted Tank Guru
 
malkore's Avatar
 
PTrader: (0/0%)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 2,165
Default

the actinic is only providing some blue spectrum. you'd be much better off replacing it with a full spectrum bulb.

Plus, blue light in a freshwater tank just looks wrong. PLease save the actinic's for us reefers.
__________________
Malkore
Filstar XP2 PIMP #3
Visit my aquarium pages - see specs on my tanks, and photos of how they've evolved
malkore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2004, 04:57 PM   #6
Blade
Algae Grower
 
PTrader: (0/0%)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Oregon
Posts: 139
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by meee
from wat ive learned in biology, plants grow best in the red and blue spectrum of lighting, so i would think that the blue lights would actually be kinda helpful. i would get another opinion though, because i could be wrong.

That's what I remember fro Bio as well. Oh well it still makes the Cardinals look awesome
Blade is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Unique 50 gallon lighting dedbuffalo Lighting 5 08-02-2004 05:58 PM
Lighting for an 18 gallon tank? m3th0d Lighting 1 07-03-2004 04:44 PM
lighting a 75 gallon tarantulaguy Lighting 1 05-01-2004 03:28 AM
Lighting question for a 7 gallon Minibow FishyPlants Lighting 3 04-09-2004 02:09 PM
5.5 gallon tank lighting evan Lighting 9 07-08-2003 05:19 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Planted Tank LLC 2012