|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
#1 |
|
Planted Member
|
FX5 or 2 XP3s for 125 gallon
I am planning my next build which will be a standard 125 gallon tank. For filtration I had made my mind up on using an FX5. But, I have read a lot of mixed reviews on the FX5 and am starting to second guess it. At the same I have read a ton of good stuff about the Rena filters. So, I am considering going with two XP3s instead. Either way I go I also plan to use my current Cascade 1000 as well. I will run my heater and co2 reactor off of the Cascade so the flow of the new filter(s) will be unimpeded. Also, the plan is to buy a drilled tank and plumb everything through the bottom. Any thoughts, advice, feedback, or experience would be greatly appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Algae Grower
|
Ive been running an fx5 on my 90 gallon for 3 years with zero issues. The flow is a little much for my tank so i just turn down the output. I think the advantage to the xp3 is that they make a spray bar and fluval doesnt make one for the fx5 so you have to make your own if thats the route you choose to go.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Wannabe Guru
|
Eheim 2260/62
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Planted Tank Guru
|
I love my fx5 on my 75g tank. It works flawlessly. TONS of room in it for media. Good flow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Planted Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Planted Tank Guru
|
A really quick google search shows the 2262 for 400 shipped, the 2260 for 361 shipped, and the FX5 for 200 shipped. Yeah, the price difference is still huge, but your pricing was a bit off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Wannabe Guru
|
The price greatly reflects the quality... having used both I think a single 2262 would accomplish what 2 FX5s can. But then again the benefits of having two filters vs. one would be greater.
I'm running 2 fx5s on my 180 and 2 2262 on my 125 and the difference is unexplainable. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Planted Tank Guru
|
There will be a used 2262 in the SnS soon as well depending on how mcuh ofa hurry your in.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Planted Tank Obsessed
|
I have used neither the FX5 nor the rena...but I will say that I generally prefer two filters to one. You can alternate cleaning and one backs up the other in case of failure.
__________________
Eheim Pimp Club Member #498Running Tanks: Future Plans: 180+ G Angel Tank |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Planted Member
|
I have no doubt that the Eheim is better than the other two options. But, unfortunately it is not in my price range. Also, I think either of the two options will be sufficient for a 125. I like the FX5 on paper because of the amount of flow it puts out. But, I have read a number of posts where people have said that the flow is drastically reduced when it's loaded with media (I know this is an issue with all canisters, but seems to be more so on the FX5) I have also read that it can be a little bulky/heavy/awkward to maneuver around when it's time to clean. Some report having problems with it clogging which causes it to stop entirely. The pros of the Renas are that they a little smaller which would make them easier to move in and out of the stand. Also, everything that I have read about the is positive. Many people say they are very dependable, as well as very easy to clean and prime. I also do like having the redundancy of having two filters. Although either way I will have at least 2 as I will be using my Cascade 1000 with either solution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Wannabe Guru
|
If you can afford it, go the 2 XP3's.
I do this on my 75 with 2 knock-off eheims. I do this mainly to prevent ammonia spikes when I clean a filter. If you have a high bio-load this is more prominent. Clean Canister #1 at the beginning of the month, clean the second 3 weeks after the first and cycle it like that. Usually I just take the floss out and rinse it as that's where most of the gunk builds up. I've been to several aquariums and most of their large exhibits have 2 filtration systems. My other 2 tanks have always had 2 canisters. Personal preference? Maybe, but I've never seemed to have problems with heavy stocking -- my 2 cents :smiles: |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Wannabe Guru
|
Quote:
Pm me a price if you are selling, I will be in the market for another. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Planted Member
|
Quote:
BTW, I am going to go with Catalina lighting. I didn't even know they made filters. How do you like them? I am not at all opposed to going with an off brand. I've actually been very happy with the Cascade that I have now. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Wannabe Guru
|
Quote:
![]() I have nothing to complain against the Catalina. I've been using it solidly for a year with the same bulbs. The Catalina has its advantages and disadvantages. They pros outweighed the cons. I believe the disconnects could be better. It would be easier if I had more vertical space in my stand. I have found a little vaseline on the sides of the disconnects and on the o-rings helped immensely. And after you drain the filter completely and then go to let the gravity fill it 1.) make sure the outflow is out of water. 2.) leave one corner of the clamps undone till almost full (you'll hear the difference). If you don't do that and plug the filter in you'll hear the motor and no water, they aren't as quiet as eheims, but in a closed stand you can't hear them. They were worth the 75$ each. Hope that helped - also have been using about a year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Planted Tank Guru
|
Because it hasn't been mentioned, and I think needs to be mentioned in every "what canister?" thread, please check out the SunSun generics. Check Evilbay or Aquatop for the 302/303/304 or 402/403/404 filters. Other than "they're Asian knockoffs, therefore they're crap" comments, every criticism of them is similar to the type you'd find about Western-industry cans. I won't claim they're superior to much of anything, but denying them a place in any basic can comparison is ridiculous. Check them out before you make an ultimate decision.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|