Undergravel filter : Am I crazy?
Planted Tank Forums
Your Tanks Image Hosting *Tank Tracker * Plant Profiles Fish Profiles Planted Tank Guide Photo Gallery Articles

Go Back   The Planted Tank Forum > General Planted Tank Forums > General Planted Tank Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-07-2004, 08:41 PM   #1
Ianice Berg
Algae Grower
 
PTrader: (0/0%)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Norfolk, England
Posts: 42
Cool

Undergravel filter : Am I crazy?


Below is my plan for deploying a UGF in a plant & fish (cardinals only) tank.

Have you ever tried something like this? Please let me know what you think of the plan - good or bad!

Apart from radiantly healthy plants and fish, my goals with this are; low-ish maintenance, very long term sustainability, no messy, expensive or layered substrates, low turbulance, large (stable) bio filter volume, "natural" plant fertilisation, no 100% dead areas, no heater cables.

Description:

An external canister filter reverse-feeds an UGF.

A fine (20um) filter sheet is placed beneath the area(s) to be planted (about 75% of area in my plan).

75mm - 100mm of fine inert gravel (< 2mm) is layered on top.

Thats it!

Rationale:

The point of the fine filter sheet is to ensure that the flow in rooted areas is fairly low, encouraging further natural "clogging" whilst allowing a very small residual flow (i.e. no totally dead zones or heater cables!).

The cut out(s) in the filter sheet should concentrate the return flow trough the unplanted floor area(s), reducing the clogging there. The unplanted floor area(s) act as high volume filter and low turbulance return path and will be "hoovered" regularly if necessary.

This setup would of course only suit aquascapes where leaving some of the floor area unplanted is acceptable or desirable.

thanks,
Ianice Berg is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 09-07-2004, 09:44 PM   #2
malkore
Planted Tank Guru
 
malkore's Avatar
 
PTrader: (0/0%)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 2,165
Default

No clue. I abandon'd UGF's due to their inferior filtration method. Canisters and lots of plants is my technique.
__________________
Malkore
Filstar XP2 PIMP #3
Visit my aquarium pages - see specs on my tanks, and photos of how they've evolved
malkore is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-07-2004, 11:09 PM   #3
Wasserpest
Are these real?
 
Wasserpest's Avatar
 
PTrader: (163/100%)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Monterey, CA
Posts: 14,877
Talking

Ianice, welcome to the Planted Tank!

It's an interesting theory which hasn't proven to be long-term stable. Several issues:

The slow flow through the substrate is still too fast, and the oxygen-rich water makes trace elements unavailable to plant roots. Not much of a natural fertilization. Sure, you could reduce the flow to almost nil, but the many plant roots will further block the little flow and finally there won't be any, so why go through all the troubles?

Roots find their way down into the UGF cavity, clogging it up over time. Again, it works for the unplanted area, but what's the point? Fishies and plants don't mind a little turbulence (water movement), and in a planted tank, biofiltration isn't that much of an issue anyway.

For root feeders, adding some kind of fertilizer tabs to their proximity is almost necessary when using gravel. The reverse UGF will slowly move that into the water column. There isn't much control in terms of where the actual flow occurs, but for sure it ends up in the water instead of feeding the roots.

The normal tendency of mulm/fish poop to disappear into the gravel will be reversed by the reverse UGF, instead of disappearing, it will collect on the surface (I think). A big sponge in a canister filter has a better holding capacity and is easier to clean than an area of gravel in your tank.

You might end up having radiantly healthy plants either way, but with the UGF, you actually hear a little time bomb ticking... a place that slowly fills up with yucky muck, although... maybe you could reverse the flow and suck out the muck once in a while... Maybe you should just try it!
Wasserpest is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-10-2004, 04:06 PM   #4
Ianice Berg
Algae Grower
 
PTrader: (0/0%)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Norfolk, England
Posts: 42
Red face

Thanks for your comments.

I have almost abandoned the UGF plan already

How does a "canister-only" system run long term if there are a few fish around?

I only intend to have 20 or so cardinals in a 48 x 15 x 18 tank but coming from a "fishy" background I am slightly nervous about running without large bio-active medium somewhere in the system . Actually the truth is I am a bit lazy and in a hard water area so I dont want to do too much water changeing.

I presume you wouldn't recommend areation of any sort if you are adding C02?

regards,
Ianice Berg is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-10-2004, 05:19 PM   #5
dogg76
Planted Tank Obsessed
 
dogg76's Avatar
 
PTrader: (0/0%)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 390
Default

you would be wasting your time using an air pump. all the agitation from the bubbles would cause you to lose most or all of the co2. besides, if you have enough plants they should produce enough oxygen..
__________________
75 gal, Schultz aquatic soil substrate. Filstar XP2 and a H.O.T. Magnum canister filter, 20# Pressurized Co2, Coralife 4x65 watt pc lighting.

Filstar Pimp#83
dogg76 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-10-2004, 09:12 PM   #6
Wasserpest
Are these real?
 
Wasserpest's Avatar
 
PTrader: (163/100%)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Monterey, CA
Posts: 14,877
Default

20 cardinals in a 50gal or so planted tank isn't much of a bioload. Unless there is a couple of plecos lurking somewhere

Canister filters have a comparatively large surface for beneficial bacteria, and if you are careful when cleaning the filter the will not be harmed, but again, in a planted tank biofiltration is pretty much done by the plants.

The problem with being lazy is that if you have a planted tank, you need to feed the plants, and the fertilizer that you throw into the tank somewhat messes up water chemistry, and therefore most of us end up with rather large weekly water changes. If that isn't your thing, you might shoot for the low-maintenance method, where you use only around 1.5Watts/gal light, little or no CO2, and undemanding plants which grow slowly and thrive mostly off whatever the fishes metabolism (and decaying plants, leftover fish food...) produces.
Wasserpest is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the The Planted Tank Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can an undergravel filter work for a planted tank? Hoosch Equipment 8 01-16-2004 05:58 PM
Undergravel filter and large rock question. oe254 Equipment 18 01-02-2004 03:07 AM
can i use an undergravel filter ANUBA General Planted Tank Discussion 3 06-14-2003 03:15 PM
Undergravel filter question... Fish dude Equipment 6 01-04-2003 03:38 AM
Reverse flow undergravel filter NFish General Planted Tank Discussion 3 11-21-2002 03:58 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Planted Tank LLC 2012