Does a plant's size or growth stage impact its nutrient uptake?
Planted Tank Forums
Your Tanks Image Hosting *Tank Tracker * Plant Profiles Fish Profiles Planted Tank Guide Photo Gallery Articles

Go Back   The Planted Tank Forum > Specific Aspects of a Planted Tank > Fertilizers and Water Parameters


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-17-2013, 06:18 PM   #1
scottytank
Algae Grower
 
scottytank's Avatar
 
PTrader: (1/100%)
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 46
Default

Does a plant's size or growth stage impact its nutrient uptake?


For example, does a newly cut and planted stem of say Rotala Rotundifolia at about 3" tall uptake less or more nutrients than an established 10" stem? Does the new stem require more nutrients to establish? Does the established stem require more nutrients to keep a larger amount of plant healthy? Does it end up a wash in the end?

Just curious if anyone has any information or ideas on this.
__________________
scottytank is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 03-17-2013, 06:36 PM   #2
Ashnic05
Planted Tank Obsessed
 
Ashnic05's Avatar
 
PTrader: (1/100%)
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 497
Default

The bigger the plant = the more nutrients it needs. Smaller plants, while attempting to absorb as much nutrients as possilbe to grow larger, will still use less of them than a fully grown plant.
__________________
“Alive without breath,
As cold as death;
Never thirsty, ever drinking,
All in mail never clinking.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien

FINNEX CLUB MEMBER!
Ashnic05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2013, 08:03 PM   #3
steven p
Wannabe Guru
 
steven p's Avatar
 
PTrader: (1/100%)
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: columbus, ne
Posts: 1,496
Default

Flowering plants also use different ratios of ferts than their vegatative counterparts.
__________________
steven p is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2013, 08:45 PM   #4
scottytank
Algae Grower
 
scottytank's Avatar
 
PTrader: (1/100%)
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 46
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashnic05 View Post
The bigger the plant = the more nutrients it needs. Smaller plants, while attempting to absorb as much nutrients as possilbe to grow larger, will still use less of them than a fully grown plant.
So essentially if you do a major trim in a tank the uptake rates will decline to a fraction of it would be at full growth then correct?
__________________
scottytank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2013, 09:24 PM   #5
Darkblade48
Moderator
 
Darkblade48's Avatar
 
PTrader: (3/100%)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 9,262
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scottytank View Post
So essentially if you do a major trim in a tank the uptake rates will decline to a fraction of it would be at full growth then correct?
There are other factors to consider (i.e. the bottom of the plant might not be as dense/not require as much nutrients as the growing portion at the top), but looking at it simply, yes.
__________________
Anthony

A Primer to Pressurized CO2 and A Primer to Planted Tanks
Eheim Pimp #362 - Eheim 2213 x2, Eheim 2028, Eheim 2217, Eheim surface skimmer and Eheim autofeeder.
Victor Pimp #33 - HPT272-125-350-4M
Darkblade48 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2013, 09:29 PM   #6
ThatGuyWithTheFish
perugiae
 
ThatGuyWithTheFish's Avatar
 
PTrader: (23/100%)
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Boston
Posts: 2,347
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scottytank View Post
So essentially if you do a major trim in a tank the uptake rates will decline to a fraction of it would be at full growth then correct?
Not really. The best way to find out would just be to measure your nitrates at the end of the week and see how, if it all, it differs.
__________________

"Boulders-Upon-Meadow"


My Golden Rule of planted tanks: WWTAD-
"What would Takashi Amano do?"


RAOK Club #69
ThatGuyWithTheFish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2013, 11:02 PM   #7
Hoppy
Planted Tank Guru
 
Hoppy's Avatar
 
PTrader: (74/100%)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 18,794
Default

If your light sits on top of the tank, the light intensity is high at the water surface and much lower at the substrate. So, short plants are in lower intensity lighting, and will grow slower, as a result, thus using less of all of the nutrients.
__________________
Hoppy
Hoppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2013, 08:44 PM   #8
talontsiawd
Planted Tank Guru
 
talontsiawd's Avatar
 
PTrader: (1/100%)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 4,298
Send a message via AIM to talontsiawd
Default

I don't know how true any of this is but these are my thoughts. I tend to fertilize less after a large trim for a few reasons. The stems you cut and replanted are likely shocked a bit but the plants you just cut the tops off seem to be more shocked. You also often don't see new growth for 24-48 hours, possibly considerably longer if low tech. Lastly, your plants grow more slowly as on most tanks, their is far more light at the top than the bottom.

I may not be correct on all but I will say that I will get a huge algae bloom on tanks that aren't particularly balanced to begin with. That leads me to believe that the plants are not taking up much of anything for a short period of time.
talontsiawd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2013, 03:49 AM   #9
plantbrain
Planted Tank Guru
 
plantbrain's Avatar
 
PTrader: (256/100%)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The swamp
Posts: 13,385
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by talontsiawd View Post
I may not be correct on all but I will say that I will get a huge algae bloom on tanks that aren't particularly balanced to begin with. That leads me to believe that the plants are not taking up much of anything for a short period of time.
So is it the nutrients or is it the something else that's not balanced?

I trim with extreme prejudice.
I also dose the same either way.
Never seen any thing I could say is dependent on nutrients.


Hoppy's comments about light, as a stem grows taller and gets closer to the light= this will increase CO2 demand and then nutrient demand.

At least till it hits the surface and then the CO2 demand is easily met.
Older leaves do not have much nutrient demand vs new leaves.

But after a big hack, the nutrient demand is much lower, so dosing less will be okay also, but dosing the same will/should pose no issues.

If so, then something other than the ferts is the real problem.
__________________
Regards,
Tom Barr
plantbrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2013, 05:12 PM   #10
talontsiawd
Planted Tank Guru
 
talontsiawd's Avatar
 
PTrader: (1/100%)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 4,298
Send a message via AIM to talontsiawd
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by plantbrain View Post
So is it the nutrients or is it the something else that's not balanced?

I trim with extreme prejudice.
I also dose the same either way.
Never seen any thing I could say is dependent on nutrients.


Hoppy's comments about light, as a stem grows taller and gets closer to the light= this will increase CO2 demand and then nutrient demand.

At least till it hits the surface and then the CO2 demand is easily met.
Older leaves do not have much nutrient demand vs new leaves.

But after a big hack, the nutrient demand is much lower, so dosing less will be okay also, but dosing the same will/should pose no issues.

If so, then something other than the ferts is the real problem.
That is was kind of my point. I still think in this instance, even though you may have lighting/co2 issues, the nutrient demand bottoming out allows algae to grow much more rapidly. I am not saying it the root cause of of the outbreak, I theorize that it's an indicator of plants not taking up nutrients, if that makes since. I am just saying it's my theory.

I don't believe that this has happened to me on a tank that has been algae free for long periods of time, which I consider to be balanced, so I am not at all implying that fertilizers are going to be the imbalance. I was just stating scenario's (above where you quoted me) where I believe a plant has different nutrient demands than others.
talontsiawd is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Planted Tank LLC 2012