|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
#61 |
|
Planted Member
|
seachem matrix bio best ?
__________________
29g Tetra Tank
100g Planted Angel/Clown Loach I can't spell...Im an engineer, I do math |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#62 |
|
Planted Member
|
__________________
29g Tetra Tank
100g Planted Angel/Clown Loach I can't spell...Im an engineer, I do math |
|
|
|
|
|
#63 | |
|
Moderator
|
Those images show that the process referred to as denitrification reduces nitrates to nitrous oxide (through nitrite) and/or nitrogen gas.
Direct reduction of nitrates to ammonium (ammonia) is done by a process known as "Dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA)" Here is some good reading for more information regarding DNRA. Quote:
__________________
Anthony
A Primer to Pressurized CO2 and A Primer to Planted Tanks Eheim Pimp #362 - Eheim 2213 x2, Eheim 2028, Ehein 2217, Eheim surface skimmer and Eheim autofeeder. Victor Pimp #33 - HPT272-125-350-4M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Planted Member
|
So basically the end result would be N2 in a crystaline form at the soil/water contact point as a result of DNRA? I did find a few more articles one from a text book from 07, still relavant though
Biogeochemistry January 2008, Volume 87, Issue 1, pp 99-111 http://link.springer.com/article/10....9171-6?LI=true Good job Dark, I happen to have gotten into fish tanks not for their beauty but for the science...thanks for fanning the flame.
__________________
29g Tetra Tank
100g Planted Angel/Clown Loach I can't spell...Im an engineer, I do math |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 | |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
Regarding your link to the article (not a textbook), it points out that "the importance of DNRA in freshwater sediments appears to be minor relative to DNF." As I previously mentioned, DNRA is probably rarer than denitrification.
__________________
Anthony
A Primer to Pressurized CO2 and A Primer to Planted Tanks Eheim Pimp #362 - Eheim 2213 x2, Eheim 2028, Ehein 2217, Eheim surface skimmer and Eheim autofeeder. Victor Pimp #33 - HPT272-125-350-4M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Planted Member
|
Physics major/Engineer...so chem baffles me. Is DNRA bacterial related or is it just a natural chemical reaction based on water conditions?
__________________
29g Tetra Tank
100g Planted Angel/Clown Loach I can't spell...Im an engineer, I do math |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Planted Member
|
Seems its strictly bacterial related only and only in an anaerobic environment specifically pseudomonas and clostridium bacteria. which brings us back to the zero air zone in the matrix, but my follow on question would be, if this is naturally occuring in nature has it been established in a tank? would seem to me outside of trace elements needing to be refreshed would almost eliminate the need for water changes?
__________________
29g Tetra Tank
100g Planted Angel/Clown Loach I can't spell...Im an engineer, I do math |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 | ||
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
Quote:
Some things that happen in test conditions, do not necessarily happen in nature, and vice versa. On top of that, since nature is not controllable, it makes things even more complicated. As I mentioned, DNRA is much less common than denitrification. The amounts of ammonia/ammonium being produced would be much less than nitrites/nitrous oxides that would be produced through the denitrification pathway. So, let's assume that nitrites are being produced; the amount of it being produced would be dependent on the number of facultative aerobic bacteria, which would be in turn based on the amount of anaerobic space there is in the Matrix biomedia (assuming it exists). This surface area would be greatly outmatched by the surface area that exists in aerobic conditions, so nitrification (production of nitrates) would be much more favoured. With nitrates being produced, water changes will be required (assuming you do not have a planted aquarium whereby plants are uptaking nitrates...). To my knowledge, in reef aquariums, the production of nitrates is slowed down through the addition/construction of a plenum.
__________________
Anthony
A Primer to Pressurized CO2 and A Primer to Planted Tanks Eheim Pimp #362 - Eheim 2213 x2, Eheim 2028, Ehein 2217, Eheim surface skimmer and Eheim autofeeder. Victor Pimp #33 - HPT272-125-350-4M |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#69 | |
|
Planted Tank Enthusiast
|
Quote:
__________________
1x 180g - 1x 75g - 4x 55g - 1x 29g - 1x 20g - 1x 15g
Geo's - Cory's - Loaches - Ram's - Firemouths - Convicts - Endlers - Tetras - Plants - Jack Dempsey's - Shrimp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Planted Member
|
Unfortunately I am not able to tell, both are silica based but since pumice has such a huge range between 78ish percent all the way to about 89 percent. I can not tell, at this point I couldnt even difinitively say my BBQ grill scrubbers are pumice.
and am considering removing them. The only thing I can say for sure is the channels or pores under microscope are very similar. El cheapo microscope though so at this point my two samples are in the hands of a geologist adjunct professor. It was suggested I heat both samples to about 800 degrees and if they flow then they do belong to the glass family of compounds.....but that wouldn't answer is Matrix pumice....
__________________
29g Tetra Tank
100g Planted Angel/Clown Loach I can't spell...Im an engineer, I do math |
|
|
|
|
|
#71 | |
|
Planted Tank Enthusiast
|
Quote:
I would think this would be the important part for it's purpose as biomedia. Even if it isn't exactly pumice, if it is similar enough, then people could probably get similar results using much cheaper horticultural pumice. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|