|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
#1 |
|
Planted Tank Guru
|
What do you prefer Low Tech or High Tech?
Well like the title says "What do you prefer Low Tech or High Tech?
As of right now low tech because I don't use CO2 or dose anything.
__________________
110g Tropical Community & Sakura Shrimp
55g BN Breeding Grounds, Peacock Gudgeons, Panda, Pygmies, & Smudge Spot Cories, Rili Shrimp 10g RCS and show guppies MIAPG - Come join us - Plantedtank - MI - Greatlakesaquaria |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Planted Member
|
I have various degrees on low-tech & high tech tanks mandated by the flora, lighting and substrate of my diffrent tanks.
But my fav is natural planted tanks with med. light & liquid fert dosing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Planted Tank Guru
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Planted Tank Guru
|
No I haven't posted pics of my tanks. I don't have the fancy setups like others. I've wanting to get pics of my tanks.
__________________
110g Tropical Community & Sakura Shrimp
55g BN Breeding Grounds, Peacock Gudgeons, Panda, Pygmies, & Smudge Spot Cories, Rili Shrimp 10g RCS and show guppies MIAPG - Come join us - Plantedtank - MI - Greatlakesaquaria |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Wannabe Guru
|
i prefer both
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Planted Tank Obsessed
|
Low tech! With dirt!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Algae Grower
|
low tech for sure you can make it look just as good without the costs
__________________
30g community and 5.5g RCS
Check out my tanks: http://www.youtube.com/user/graysonk...e=results_main |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Algae Grower
|
Where really is the line when comes to high and low tech? I mean, you can have all the research time and money put into a Low tech tank just because you chose to do DIY instead of dropping bills to get pricey equipment and still get that "high" tech tank look. Or you can drop loads of funds into equipment for a high tech tank, then not have any clue how to use it properly to its full potential and barely get the results you would with a low tech setup. Personally I am a mix, I'll drop coin into quality equip when I have to, but DIY if i know i can make it work just as well, if not better.
__________________
Gennessee/Lapeer County Aquarists
http://www.facebook.com/groups/424524554267556/ My Youtube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/duckmasta |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Planted Tank Guru
|
Quote:
I agree with like you said it seems to depend on the individual. I think of low tech like you said Hilde. Low tech is having a light with no type of CO2(either press., DIY, or in the form like Excel or Metricid.
__________________
110g Tropical Community & Sakura Shrimp
55g BN Breeding Grounds, Peacock Gudgeons, Panda, Pygmies, & Smudge Spot Cories, Rili Shrimp 10g RCS and show guppies MIAPG - Come join us - Plantedtank - MI - Greatlakesaquaria |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Algae Grower
|
high tech because of the color's and growth you can get out of plants..
co2 is a little riskier if you don't know what you are doing, but you cannot make a low tech setup look as good as a co2 setup.. especially with plant setups like iwagumi etc.. Not to mention how co2 helps prevent most algae.. if you know what you are doing.. I haven't seen too many low tech tanks that haven't had problems with BBA amongst other massive algae problems Not sure what Rexthecrayfish meant, but take a look at a high tech co2 system, a low tech doesn't compare period |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Algae Grower
|
Quote:
]http://www.plantedtank.net/forums/sh...ad.php?t=99729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Planted Member
|
I feel that really, they are both great in different ways. A good low tech is very little maintenence with a long maturity time. High Tech is more maintenence with results that comes a lot faster. I prefer high tech because of the color you are able to have and the ability to grow just about any plant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Wannabe Guru
|
Low tech seems to be easier, safer - with less problematic water conditions risk, less worrisome, lower maintenance & less lighting need, lesser cost, easier to live with & enjoy.
The flip side is hi-tech generally produces quicker & much better results, with less potential algae problems, and usually a much better- looking, professional tank. Take your pick. I've tried both, and I'll go with low tech for less concern & headaches, overall - but it's definitely a matter of preference & your own individual experience with it. I'm quite happy with my very low-tech planted discus tank: http://s1105.photobucket.com/albums/...ul/lolliblues2 |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Planted Tank Enthusiast
|
I went hi-tech when I got my dream tank (40g breeder) from my wife a few years ago. Then my cat knocked the lights in to the tank. And then my CO2 rig went funky (couldn't hold a constant pressure).
So right now I'm mid-tech. Modified EI dosing, high light, regimented Excel, high fish load. Seems to be working alright, and I dont have to worry about massive water changes every Sunday or end of tank dumps.
__________________
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|