The Planted Tank Forum banner

finnex ray 2 on 75 gallon

7K views 19 replies 9 participants last post by  houseofcards 
#1 ·
As it says in the tittle, I was wondering if anyone has used the finnex ray 2 on a 21" tall tank and what kind of lighting did it create? Is it wide angle enough for 18"? So what I'm asking is if anyone with a 75 gallon has used the 48" finnex ray 2?
 
#2 · (Edited)
I can not address a 75 gallon directly, but I have a 58 show - which is a 75 cut down to 3 ft.

My 250watt metal halide was failing so I rushed this experiment (it will run about 10 minutes and then turn off for about the same). Took pictures with the Ray 2, a shop light 2xodno, and my 250 watt. Brightness wise the 250watt is much brighter - but then again it is 250watts (versus 100, and 28). I think the ray 2 was brighter than the odno - but my camera's exif data does not show a material difference (the odno has more spill, so that may have caused the camera data to be skewed).

Since I only went to the ray 2 this weekend - I have no experience to how the plants will enjoy it or not - I have had significant deterioration over the last 2 weeks as the hqi failed.
----
Please understand, I am bias as I have always tried to keep more than 200 watts on top of my 3 ft tank. I think I was in the HIGH light level, and have probably fallen to medium to medium-high. I will edit this post once I post pictures on my tanks blog.
----
Ray II


2x ODNO Shoplight


250watt HQI


Please note that these are iphone pictures with auto exposure on. To keep perspective, the first 2 have 1/20 second exposure times - the third is 1/129 second.
 
#4 ·
The data in http://www.plantedtank.net/forums/showthread.php?t=189944 show that you would get medium light, around 45-50 micromols of PAR, with that light on a standard 75 gallon tank. Last week I measured the PAR from a 16 inch long RayII light, and the readings were very close to what is in that thread, including the spread of the light. I think those are superb lights for getting good uniform light over a very large area. And, don't forget some light will be reflected off the front and back glass down to the substrate, so you should get even more PAR than the data show.
 
#5 ·
Perfect. Thanks to both of you for your input. Being in the medium light level is what I'm tying to be in. Still great light and matches my diy co2 quite well. Know I know what I'm going to ask the wife for Christmas.
 
#16 ·
I have 2 36" Ray II fixtures on a 50 gal. Only drawing 29 watts for the daylight 290 LED model, these things throw an awesome amount of light. After what Hoppy said, I'm considering hanging mine from the ceiling. Radiant heat is almost non existent. I can pick one up in the center and it is barely warm. I'm a fan!
 
#15 ·
In addition to the refraction of the light as it enters the water (essentially creating a lens), there is now a water/glass rather than an air/glass interface which I suspect reflects more light (plus that light is at a different angle when it hits the glass causing greater reflection).
 
#18 · (Edited)
meh.. you can throw a lot of science on this, but home aquariums are not controlled science experiments. Any manufacturer will state their highest, most desirable numbers in a controlled setting, but it's really not 'real life' In the same way my car is suppose to get 40 mpg, but only get's 30. I guess the auto manufacturer forget that in real life people don't drive in wind tunnels, and they don't keep a constant speed of 50. And the biggest surprise is they actually have other people in the car too. On thing your forgetting is the tank the light goes on is not empty there will be hardscape and other plants in the way, there will be surface movement and water that isn't crystal clear like the air. Some light can also be reflected up and out or away from the plants. So give me PAR through air and an empty tank and I'll give you a Jeep that think's it's a Prius.
 
#19 ·
agreed - everything we do is an estimation. More of an art than a science. PAR in Air gives us a good comparable baseline.

That said, I now have I week with the Ray II on my tank. While much less light than my HQI Metal Halide - I am getting much better growth with the Ray II than I expected (abet I expected to see plants gradually melting away - so any growth is much better than I expected). Lots of new shoots and leaves. Makes me more optimistic.
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top