**Official TPT NIKON Pimp Club** Join us instead, Canon has cooties! - Page 34
Planted Tank Forums
Your Tanks Image Hosting *Tank Tracker * Plant Profiles Fish Profiles Planted Tank Guide Photo Gallery Articles

Go Back   The Planted Tank Forum > General Planted Tank Forums > Photography


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-24-2012, 06:37 PM   #496
AquaStudent
Wannabe Guru
 
AquaStudent's Avatar
 
PTrader: (10/100%)
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 1,234
Default

At least one of the reviews claim it works for the D5000 camera. The image sensor in the front of the camera is going to be a bit undesirable for me but there's no way around it.

It is the little things that make a huge difference.

I'm presuiming the camera using an IR sensor to detect it. I think I saw in the menu where to set it to look for that. Thanks Elmo and Amy for the help.
AquaStudent is online now   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 07-24-2012, 07:41 PM   #497
TickleMyElmo
Planted Tank Enthusiast
 
TickleMyElmo's Avatar
 
PTrader: (5/100%)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 807
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AquaStudent View Post
At least one of the reviews claim it works for the D5000 camera. The image sensor in the front of the camera is going to be a bit undesirable for me but there's no way around it.

It is the little things that make a huge difference.

I'm presuiming the camera using an IR sensor to detect it. I think I saw in the menu where to set it to look for that. Thanks Elmo and Amy for the help.
Yep its on the front, and its listed as compatible with the D5000 on the official Nikon site, so I'd say you're good.
TickleMyElmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 07:49 PM   #498
Crispino L Ramos
Planted Tank Guru
 
Crispino L Ramos's Avatar
 
PTrader: (456/100%)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 2,460
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zainey_04 View Post
If I counted correctly I would be a Nikon pimp 007. I have a Nikon D5000 We should also post one or more of our best shots. These are uploaded from my cell so there not at full resolution. I'll upload the originals when I get home from work. - Zain
Those are awesome photos, thanks for posting.
__________________
Crispino L Ramos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2012, 08:18 PM   #499
Pen3
Planted Member
 
PTrader: (17/100%)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hopkins, MN
Posts: 273
Default

Just got myself an almost new Tokina 100mm AT-X Pro f/2.8 for $370 shipped with box and all accessories including warranty paper and receipt.
Pen3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2012, 04:04 AM   #500
haoly123
Algae Grower
 
haoly123's Avatar
 
PTrader: (0/0%)
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Round Rock, Texas 78664
Posts: 23
Default Me and the D5100 with a 35mm would love a spot :)

__________________
ThatFish"N"FotoKid
haoly123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2012, 12:46 AM   #501
zdnet
Planted Tank Enthusiast
 
PTrader: (0/0%)
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 532
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TickleMyElmo View Post
No such thing in that price range. There is the 60mm macro, and the 85mm macro, but with the 60mm the subject needs to be within an inch or two of the front element, and the 85mm has sloppy optics (not the best quality) and the subject has to be 5.5 inches from the front element for macro magnification. The only acceptable choice for any decent sized aquarium would be the 105mm 2.8 Macro which gives you about 12.5 inches of space from the front element to the subject, but thats $900.
ISTM there is a mix up here. The 12.5 inches mentioned for the 105mm is the lens' minimum focus distance which measures from the camera's focal plane mark to the object. Therefore, you do not get 12.5 inches between the lens' front element and the object.

In fact, the minimum focus distance (and the distance between the front element and object) for the 85mm and the 105mm differ by only one inch. Here are the minimum focus distance numbers from Nikon:

* For AF-S Micro Nikkor 60mm f/2.8G ED, it is 7.3 in.

* For AF-S DX Micro Nikkor 85mm f/3.5G ED VR, it is 11.3 in.

* For AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED, it is 12.4 in.

BTW, the previous generation of the Nikon 105mm micro is only half the price of the current generation.

Also, the previous generation has much lower chromatic aberrations (CA):

* Previous generation: Micro-Nikkor AF 105mm f/2.8 D


* Current generation: AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED



And if you go for the 85mm, its CA is even much lower:

* AF-S DX Micro Nikkor 85mm f/3.5G ED VR


Yes, the 85mm lens does not provide the best optical quality for all around shooting. The lens is not as bright (which makes focusing a bit tough) and its SWM (Silent Wave Motor) mechanism is a bit slow.

But for getting sharp macro with decent depth of field (which requires stopping down the lens), the 85mm is the best of all three Nikon micros (60mm, 85mm, 105mm). It blows the current generation of 105mm out of the water.

Of course, you have to get closer to the object by one inch. In return, you get a much sharper macro with plenty of depth of field (assuming you have a capable flash like the Nikon SB-900).

Last edited by zdnet; 08-05-2012 at 12:57 AM.. Reason: .
zdnet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2012, 02:17 AM   #502
TickleMyElmo
Planted Tank Enthusiast
 
TickleMyElmo's Avatar
 
PTrader: (5/100%)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 807
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zdnet View Post
Test charts and such
Yeah, that's great, but thats because the 85 is a DX lens, so the crop factor is built into the MFD. I'm using a full frame camera, so the 85 is rather useless to me. I can't speak for crop cameras, and they're not the 35mm standard, so I don't include them in my postings.

And yes, you can save a bunch of money on the older 105mm macro, but you need a camera with the screw drive autofocus motor built in, which frankly, not a lot of people have. Lots of D3100s and D5100s on here.
TickleMyElmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2012, 03:24 AM   #503
zdnet
Planted Tank Enthusiast
 
PTrader: (0/0%)
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 532
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TickleMyElmo View Post
Yeah, that's great, but thats because the 85 is a DX lens, so the crop factor is built into the MFD. I'm using a full frame camera, so the 85 is rather useless to me. I can't speak for crop cameras, and they're not the 35mm standard, so I don't include them in my postings.

And yes, you can save a bunch of money on the older 105mm macro, but you need a camera with the screw drive autofocus motor built in, which frankly, not a lot of people have. Lots of D3100s and D5100s on here.
Your postings actually recommended against the 85mm. Since most of the DSLR users are using crop cameras including the D3100 and D5100, the 85mm is a bargain for them.
zdnet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2012, 04:38 AM   #504
TickleMyElmo
Planted Tank Enthusiast
 
TickleMyElmo's Avatar
 
PTrader: (5/100%)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 807
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zdnet View Post
Your postings actually recommended against the 85mm. Since most of the DSLR users are using crop cameras including the D3100 and D5100, the 85mm is a bargain for them.
Yeah, but don't forget, the 105 is an FX lens, so when you use it on a DX body you get the crop factor, so it creates even more working distance than when used on an FX body, so the 105 is still the better lens.
TickleMyElmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2012, 03:00 PM   #505
zdnet
Planted Tank Enthusiast
 
PTrader: (0/0%)
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 532
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TickleMyElmo View Post
Yeah, but don't forget, the 105 is an FX lens, so when you use it on a DX body you get the crop factor, so it creates even more working distance than when used on an FX body, so the 105 is still the better lens.
Ha, ha... I wish you were right. But the working distance to achieve a 1:1 macro magnification is the same even though you are using an FX lens on a DX body.

If you were right, applying an FX macro lens on a DX body would have given more than 1:1 magnification. But did you see Nikon making that claim? Or do you think Nikon's marketing department is asleep.
zdnet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2012, 07:39 PM   #506
TickleMyElmo
Planted Tank Enthusiast
 
TickleMyElmo's Avatar
 
PTrader: (5/100%)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 807
Default

Oh really? I didn't think it would affect the magnification ratio, just the working distance. Guess I'm wrong, oh well!
TickleMyElmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2012, 11:26 PM   #507
zdnet
Planted Tank Enthusiast
 
PTrader: (0/0%)
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 532
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TickleMyElmo View Post
Oh really? I didn't think it would affect the magnification ratio, just the working distance.
The lenses mentioned here were not designed to behave in that way.
zdnet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2012, 08:11 AM   #508
TickleMyElmo
Planted Tank Enthusiast
 
TickleMyElmo's Avatar
 
PTrader: (5/100%)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 807
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kunsthure View Post
Kunsthure claims Pimp #075. D5000 shooting mainly with a Tamron 90mm f/2.8 macro lens.

-Lisa
Added, as #075. Welcome!

Quote:
Originally Posted by haoly123 View Post
pic
Sure, you can be #076! Welcome, and nice pic!
TickleMyElmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2012, 09:12 PM   #509
Fuze
Planted Tank Obsessed
 
PTrader: (27/100%)
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: NYC
Posts: 300
Default

Nikon Pimp 077 here.

D70. Never got Canons really...Nikon all the way!
Fuze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2012, 02:28 PM   #510
discusonly
Planted Tank Enthusiast
 
discusonly's Avatar
 
PTrader: (14/100%)
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Mt. Laurel NJ
Posts: 618
Default

Count me in. I've had mine D90 for a few years now but ever use it much except for kids activities with the stock 18-105 lens. I am just slowly getting my feet into macro photography so I just picked up a used Sigma 105mm 2.8 to start playing
__________________
Van

Last edited by discusonly; 08-08-2012 at 05:08 PM.. Reason: sp
discusonly is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Planted Tank LLC 2012