Prime or Zoom? - Page 2
Planted Tank Forums
Your Tanks Image Hosting *Tank Tracker * Plant Profiles Fish Profiles Planted Tank Guide Photo Gallery Articles

Go Back   The Planted Tank Forum > General Planted Tank Forums > Photography

View Poll Results: Prime or Zoom lens?
Prime 6 50.00%
Zoom 6 50.00%
Point-and-shoot FTW 0 0%
Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-11-2012, 03:43 PM   #16
Planted Member
PTrader: (0/0%)
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 161

I'd say it depends on your primary subject matter really. I shoot mostly concerts and Prime's are indispensable. Currently my two main lenses that see 80% of the action are a 50mm f/1.4 and a 24mm f/1.4. My next purchase will likely be a 16-35mm f/2.8 II or a 24-70mm f/2.8 but as it stands I usually just rent those or a 70-200mm f/2.8 as needed for paying gigs.

I just love being able to shoot in available lighting handheld almost anywhere without worrying about carrying a flash or tripod around.

Here are some of my concert photos:
U2Kent is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 05-11-2012, 04:50 PM   #17
Are these real?
Wasserpest's Avatar
PTrader: (175/100%)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Monterey, CA
Posts: 15,096

I did some pixel-peeping comparisons between my cheapo 1.8/50 and 18-55 kit lenses. Surprisingly, the kit lens was very sharp starting wide open (f4@50mm). The prime, on the other hand, was very soft at f1.8, got a tad better at f2.8, and caught up to the kit lens @f4.

So, my personal conclusion... the kit lens is a better tool for me, since it is sharp wide open, has a good zoom range, and offers IS. Trying to sell my 1.8 on Craigslist.

Of course, your situation might be different. And if you do not pixel-peep as I do, the 1.8 aperture of the prime might sound really great. As they say, YMMV.

As for the original question... both have their places. Primes have an inherently simpler construction, so theoretically you get a better (sharper, wider aperture, etc) lens for the same money, or get same-as-zoom quality for less money. That's the theory at least.
Wasserpest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2012, 04:52 PM   #18
Planted Tank Guru
2in10's Avatar
PTrader: (4/100%)
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Sparks, NV
Posts: 2,585

I can't say yet since I don't have a prime yet but I am seriously considering a 50 f/1.8 or 50 f/1.4. I have a 100mm f/2.8 macro, a 18-55mm standard zoom and 50-250mm telephoto zoom. I currently use the standard zoom for full tank shots and the telephoto for specific sections but I am still learning the lenses capabilities and will most likely change uses. I have used the macro for pics of small areas also. I am intrigued to see what a fast lens can do.

I still have a P&S that I thought would be more than adequate but have now changed my mind.
2in10 is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Planted Tank LLC 2012