The Planted Tank Forum - Reply to Topic
Thread: Wasserpests Fluidoser Reply to Thread
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the The Planted Tank Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
03-20-2007 01:57 AM
Wasserpest Just wanted to update this with a picture of a more recent design - actually it just looks like the one I previously posted. Anyway...

With time, the plastic syringes harden, and it becomes increasingly difficult for the mechanics to keep things moving. All the connection points need to be really tough. I even glue the syringe to the black plastic bracket to keep it from slipping.

Maybe a glass syringe with a longer life plunger would be a good solution.
01-11-2007 05:23 PM
Wasserpest 1. Does the syringe kind of twist in the timer? It must...

Yes, the syringe tilts around the point where it is attached with the plastic wire clamp. Need to assure the syringe doesn't slip back and forth (I used some electricians tape to increase friction) but is not screwed down too hard to impede movement.

2. Do those clear plastic checkvalves work OK. What brand are they? (Not the black tetras obviously!)

I bought those in Germany, after finding out that the black ones didn't work. Don't remember the brand... Maybe buy a few here and there and see which ones work the best.

3. And you're only using this Liquid doser for the traces/iron? What, with straight Flourish or have you tried any CSM+B?

I am using it with a straight Flourish/Flourish Iron mixture. No experience with CSM+B. I was going to do phosphates the same way, but I can't inject it into the same line as the micros, plus the fairly diluted solution still degrades, so I am going towards the slow release as described in "Easier macro dosing".

4 Only dosing 2 ml /day six days a week on a 100 gallon? Hmm, maybe I'm overdosing.

Nope, I think I am underdosing... Go by Wolfen's recipe/EI. I am just on a mission to grow plants with minimum ferts.
01-11-2007 04:44 PM
Wasserpest Hey Bob, glad I was able to entertain a little

This is working very well. I have it dosing micros for my 100gal, 36gal, and (later) 55gal tanks. I started it back in August and had enough liquid to dose 4 months, so I checked levels in December, and noticed that the 36gal dosing worked perfectly, while the 100gal was only about 50% of what I had planned. I exchanged one of the checkvalves with a fine Rex brass checkvalve to minimize the backward seeping.

Basically, when the syringe is filling up, all liquid should be pulled out of the container, and when it empties out, all of it should go into the tank/supplying line, nothing back into the container.

So the trick is to find 1) fairly good checkvalves and 2) have the level of solution at about the same height as the point of injection.

I have combined this one with the waterpump macro dosing. The fluidoser injects the micro solution via a "T" into the macro line, and then once a day all of it is flushed into the tank (see post #26). Works well, especially if you have to place this under your tank into the stand, pumping it up to the tank would probably not work due to the slow seeping of check valves.

The inventor of this suggested to try different checkvalves, like those tiny ones that are used for nasal sprays and such, but I haven't found an easy way to implement them.

Getting a patent for something like this, good idea, but pretty expensive. I would have to sell a lot of those to make it worth... For now, I'll keep my day job.
01-11-2007 07:18 AM
Originally Posted by Wasserpest View Post
Brilliant explanation, and thanks for pitching in! I guess it isn't that obvious how it works. Yes, the "In" side of the not-shown vinyl tubing will go into a bottle of Flourish for hopefully many months of automatic blowing and sucking, uhm, dosing.
This thread is cracking me up! Wow, this is too ingenious. I just started laughing out loud when I saw the first picture. I thought you were joking at first. Are you still using this successfully? . Any new modifications? PS, you could consider getting a patent design on this. I wonder if this could be mass marketed. Lots of aquariums around???

1. Does the syringe kind of twist in the timer? It must...
2. Do those clear plastic checkvalves work OK. What brand are they? (Not the black tetras obviously!)
3. And you're only using this Liquid doser for the traces/iron? What, with straight Flourish or have you tried any CSM+B?
4 Only dosing 2 ml /day six days a week on a 100 gallon? Hmm, maybe I'm overdosing.
10-06-2006 05:59 PM
SCMurphy What I meant was use a duplicate of your macro doser but just pump water with the micro's being added to the line. That way you wouldn't be mixing the macros and micros in the line which can cause problems of it's own. The reservoir would not contain a mix that would grow stuff and you would still be dosing full strength.
10-06-2006 03:43 PM
Wasserpest Two reasons why I went away from the "top off doser" -- first, the mixed solution would grow "stuff" over time, and therefore second, needed to replaced and cleaned often.

Dosing full strength extends the maintenance interval quite a bit.
10-06-2006 12:58 PM
SCMurphy Maybe you could make up a 'top off' doser like the Macro doser and not mix your micros with the macros. Just to avoid the possible Fe and P precipitate potential, while gaining the added benifit of 'topping off' the tank.
10-05-2006 07:14 PM
Wasserpest One thing I found to be a problem is if the dosing solution is placed underneath the tank, and a fairly long airline goes up to the tank, there is a slight head pushing down, and no micros are dosed into the tank since the checkvalves aren't that good.

To get around that, I integrated the micro dosing with the macro powerhead dosing as drawn here:

This way, the micros are injected into the macro hose at about the same level as the dosing bottle, and the amount equals whatever the syringe doses in one turn.
09-09-2006 06:15 AM
Wasserpest Okeydokey, to bring this to its glorious conclusion...

I have two of them dosers working for two weeks now, no visible problems. I say visible because the whole deal is rather invisible. I measured a certain amount of liquid into the bottle, and put the date on it... So I know it should take 4 months to empty out, and I will check once in a while to make sure it does not empty out overnight or something like that.

Something to keep in mind is that not all checkvalves will work with this. (Anyone needs a good number of black plastic Tetra checkvalves?)

And, like I mentioned before, if you place the container above the tank level you might get a siphon going (not good).

Pretty sweet once it is set up and working... need to refill this late December, remind me if I forget.
08-20-2006 01:23 AM
Wasserpest Yep, quite simple - there was a (very slow) siphon going from the bottle through the two check valves into the measuring cup. I raised the measuring cup above the bottle and bingo, one ml per rotation.

I need to let it run for a couple of days to see if it does now the opposite thing (siphoning back into the nutrient bottle). That would mean the check valves are not working for this sort of thing, and it would probably mean the end of this little experiment.

If it doses now consistently... well then I guess it's ready for practical application.
08-19-2006 02:21 PM
vidiots Could also be a delayed reaction that is skipped when you turn the dial quickly by hand. I would think that when you move it quickly your check valves open and close quickly, but at a slower speed the check valves have to first over come friction before the internal plug moves. Although like you I would have assumed it would pump less and not more.
08-18-2006 08:16 PM
Wasserpest Hmmm... good point there Brilliant. I understand what you mean, but with the syringe and plunger being plastic, it is a tiny bit flexible, and I would think there is no inhale action there. Basically the syringe is under fairly even pressure, even if the timer would actually click back a little, it would not releave any pressure from the plunger.

And I thought about leaking... but it should actually leak the other way around, resulting in less volume rather than more.

Any other ideas are welcome...

I will test drive some of the other units I made and see if they (mis)behave as well.

Another theory of mine is that it is leaking due to the syphon between the bottle (in), device and measuring cup (out). One would think the checkvalves would prevent that, but maybe not. To check, I can just turn off the unit and leave it be for a few days and see if any liquid makes its way into the measuring cup. Thinking about it, this could be a likely explanation...
08-18-2006 05:46 PM
Brilliant Is it possible its dribbling a little bit?
When you turn the gear manually it may be hard to recreate this but what I am thinking may be this...

the gear progresses forward but then settles back a little because of the torque the application is putting against it. So every click ahead (exhale) is also sort of a inhale as well as it rests against the gear locking it in place.
08-18-2006 04:22 PM
Wasserpest Weird thing is happening...

Mechanically it is working great. I connected some tubing, stuffed one end in a Flourish bottle (filled with water) and the other end in a measuring cup.

The plunger moves to push a little over 1 ml per rev into the cup. I can duplicate that by moving the timer wheel manually. Great.

Now I let it run on its own, and it manages to push around 3-4 ml of liquid per rotation. I am stumped... I could imagine with the slow movement it would push LESS, but about 3x the amount is weird.

Any theories why that would happen?
08-14-2006 08:15 PM
Wasserpest Sorry, I didn't mean to criticize you. Just thinking out loud. Comparing one thing with another. Your posts are always appreciated! And don't hesitate to tell me I am full of it if you think so.
This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome