|Topic Review (Newest First)|
|01-17-2013 05:05 AM|
|GraphicGr8s||Glad to hear it. The kit lens is pretty good. If you decide to get into old screw mount lenses make sure you get the Pentax adapter. Third party adapters limit focus on some lenses. And the Pentax adapter isn't all that expensive. Also, don't use shake reduction with the camera on a tripod|
|01-17-2013 01:23 AM|
These photos were taken with the kit lens that came with the camera. Lens was on auto, I am pretty sure the camera settings were all on auto too.
This was taken in auto mode with the Kit lens on auto. It's and action shot thats funny.
So all in all these are the first photos I have shot with this camera and so far I love it. I highly recommend this DSLR. Don't over look Pentax. They have made a fan out of me.
|01-17-2013 01:18 AM|
I got the pentax k30 and could not be happier. I have 2 old manual lenses that fit and work GREAT on this camer. I like my manual len better then the auto kit lens. I am looking for a nice old wide angle lens on The E to the Bay .
This camera just makes sense to me. I love the menu the way the buttons are places and I got it in blue. The only thing is the kit lens is loud when focusing. Besides that I am in love.
As for lens I love that I can use old ones. My old 1982 Ricoh lens is a nice lens. It takes a great photo I was suprised I don't remember it being that good.
Since I have a love for old manual lenses this is the perfect camera. In body stabilization is perfect for using old lenses. The focusing is easy too the camera lets me know when the area I want is in focus. I love it.
People say canon and nikon have more gear. All need are some lenses, filters and flash.
I took this with my 75mm-300mm macro manual lens with a polarizer filter. In manual mode.
This was taken with my old 55mm lens from the 80s manual only. I used manual settings on the camera too.
kind of a mess up that turned out cool.
This one I was just getting use to the manual focus so its not perfect. But the color is amazing I did not editi this in any way.
Taken with the old lens. I love this lens.
|01-16-2013 07:46 PM|
|Thunder_o_b||I am a Canon user (no one else makes a lens like the MP-E65) but between the two I would go Nikon, if for no other reason than the wide range of gear that is out there for it from the third parties, and Nikon's quality is not all that bad.|
|01-09-2013 10:47 PM|
|dreamchick||poor camera. (sleeping with the fish) lol|
|12-25-2012 04:39 AM|
Ernie, Olympus is still a decent system.
Here's the deal with cameras. All of the will do a great job of getting a shot. Nikon, Canon, Pentax or Olympus. They're all good cameras. Nikon and Canon have always been the top dogs. Pentax was always third place even though many of the things we took for granted in film (and to an extent in digital) were pioneered by Pentax. They had a heck of a lot of firsts. They're lenses were always great since they also do the optics for medical imaging and also for surveying equipment and in those fields are highly regarded. Where is Pentax's failure? Marketing. Ever really see a Pentax ad anymore? Hopefully Ricoh will start a marketing program for them.
So if all the cameras do an adequate job why get one over the other? Well for me I didn't really like the way the Canon felt. I didn't like the menu layout at all.
To an extent megapixels don't matter. If I could find an ist* I'd love to get it.
|12-25-2012 12:04 AM|
I guess I am the exception here, as I shoot Olympus (e-620 to be exact). I have used Olympus for 35 years and built up a substantial collection of Olympus equipment. When I moved to digital it only made sense to stick with the brand in order to still use my vintage lenses and stuff. Now I have added several digital lenses to my arsenal.
I love Olympus cameras and lenses, and I am producing some excellent images. BUT if I had to start all over again from scratch, I would probably buy Canon for one primary reason: the MP-E 65 macro lens which gives up to 5X magnification. There is nothing out there like it for other brands. As a macro photographer, I read about that lens with serious envy.
|12-24-2012 09:49 PM|
Sure there are more Canikon shooters out there. It's a fact. Never had an argument about that. Yes I have a Pentax digital. And Pentax film. (3) And Mamiya.(4) And Minolta. (1) Those are the bodies I shoot on a regular basis. I've got a total of 12 bodies but don't use them as much.
I've also said at one point when Canon was at 8mp and the body alone was 8 grand I was ready to stroke a check for the 25-30 grand for the system. And I am glad I didn't.
What you seem to be missing is that all of the glass ever made for Pentax is still useable on the newest, latest and greatest Pentax digital bodies. You can't say that about Canon. Not sure about Nikon. There is a lot of quality old glass out there for Pentax. And it's still a decent price. Again not as true for Canikon.
I was doing a shoot at Tampa Airport. And I did meet another Pentaxian there shooting. So it's not that rare of an occurrence. I wouldn't buy a Canikon on the rare chance that I am someplace where I might need a lens I don't have and that there is someone there that might let me borrow his lens. Or that someone there if I do meet him will even have a lens to borrow.
Too many mights to justify it.
|12-24-2012 02:46 PM|
Originally Posted by GraphicGr8s View Post
Originally Posted by GraphicGr8s View Post
|12-24-2012 05:22 AM|
Originally Posted by houseofcards View Post
You could also just buy an 18-270.
There is plenty of old Pentax glass out there that is as good or better than today's plastic.
Who goes to a live show with only one lens?
|12-24-2012 12:10 AM|
|houseofcards||Well yeah, if you have old Pentax lenses than I would go that way too, but for most choosing a new camera your much more likely to find and be able to use canon or nikon glass since those two have about 80% of the DSLR market. The other day I was at live show taking pictures and I didn't realize how close my seats were and all I had was my 70-200 the guy sitting next to me had a wider lens available and since we both had canon I was saved. If I had a Pentax I would have been out of luck. I think Pentax has like 5% of the market, which doesn't make a very likely someone next to you, a friend or whatever would have one available to borrow.|
|12-21-2012 02:29 PM|
And I still use my K1000
|12-21-2012 02:28 PM|
|12-21-2012 03:41 AM|
Originally Posted by zdnet View Post
I got this one for free. If some one wants it she is 3" long and eats like a monster. She is never full.
|12-21-2012 03:07 AM|
Snapsort.com gave the K-30 a score of 100 and the D5100 only 79.
BTW, the Snapsort.com comparison is much more useful to me for making decision.
|This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.|