|06-26-2013 01:52 AM|
How has everyone attached it or are you just placing it on the aquarium glass top?
Sent from my SCH-R530U using Tapatalk 4 Beta
|06-24-2013 10:52 PM|
|rcs0926||I'm going to try using one layer of screening and see how that works out. If the lights need to be dimmed even more, then I'll add another layer or two.|
|06-24-2013 10:44 PM|
|12-07-2012 05:57 AM|
I have an AquaticLife 36" T5HO with one 6500k bulb and one Roseate bulb, I'm using 3 layers of the gray screen over my 12g Long. I'm only using the stock legs that came with the light to elevate it above the tank, so at it's highest point, the light is about 14" above the substrate, and at the lowest, about 8".
The tank has only been filled for one week, but so far so good. I'm debating on removing one layer of the screen. My photoperiod is 6.5 hours right now.
|12-07-2012 01:24 AM|
Nope, no bars.
What does your fixture look like when you place it over your tank while using the screening? Still get the bars?
|12-06-2012 08:15 PM|
|12-06-2012 01:02 PM|
|somewhatshocked||I've been using black screening with Finnex fixtures and it works well. Takes 2-3 layers to accomplish what a single layer can do with a regular bulb-type fixture, though.|
|12-06-2012 05:20 AM|
|Hoppy||It looks like you are getting a diffraction effect that makes those bars of light show up. I haven't tried the screen with a LED light, so it may not work the same way. All I know is how it works with fluorescent lights. But, when you start shining light from near point sources through any form of "grating" you can get unexpected results (unexpected only to a non-physicist).|
|12-06-2012 04:24 AM|
Hi guys, I found this thread so I just continue here...
Something is odd about the spectrum of my Finnex 36" LED light using the window screen. And I just notice I bought the grey instead of black screen. Do you guys think its because I'm using grey screen the light spectrum went out of wack like this?
Two screen on
Two screen off
The same thing happened when I only use 1 screen.
|08-14-2011 10:55 AM|
|barbarossa4122||I am so pleased I bought the window screen the other day, thanks to Hoppy. And, according to him I reduced my lights about 30 to 40%. My 55g is looking a little dimer now but, who cares. Btw, I use 2 54w Geisseman on this tank, about 10" from top of tank.|
|08-14-2011 09:28 AM|
One benefit that I use the window screen for is to shade part of my tank from the High light that some of my plant like / need and give my low light fish a place to hide from it.
|08-14-2011 12:47 AM|
There are some times that lower PAR can appear "brighter" to our eyes than some "higher" PAR situations, but it's never comparing apples to apples and there are always intervening variables that make a mess of trying to predict it.
My 11g and 45g are both LED lit but using very different LED combos and driven at different drive currents.
The 11g has a PAR of about 30 on the sandbed and it appears quite bright to my eyes. Yet my 45g, which also has around 30 on the sandbed, looks pitifully dim.
I'm not entirely sure of why this is. If I crank the LEDs up on the 45g such that it looks bright to my eyes, I get algae hell.
I'm not sure how "green" registers on a PAR meter, but our eyes are way more sensitive to green light than plants are, so a green light that's ludicrously bright to us may not be all that useful to a plant. You'd think that this means "lower PAR" on lights high in the green area, but this is just a guess.
|08-14-2011 12:24 AM|
Without a doubt, you are seeing an optical illusion or perceived difference that is not reality.
The light comparison you mention is the point that PC lights are low efficiency, nothing to do with brightness. What it means is that T5HO has more output per wattage. And by more output, "brightness" would be par. It is not that it somehow is brighter but has less usable light.
To further understand, compare incandescent lights. 100 watts of incandescent is even less efficient than PC or T8.
The reason your PC lights had less algae is simple. Less efficient bulbs and reflectors.
too much light, too little co2, and too little ferts are the cause of algae, 99.5% of the time. Once algae is established ina particular time, the time it takes to eradicate it can be very long.
|08-14-2011 12:15 AM|
all i could say is that i had 6 wpg of PC 6700K over my 20g in the past and there were no algae issue and tank looks 10x brighter than compare to my 50g tank which have 2x54w T5HO bulbs 6700K. no matter what i do in this tank, plants are always covered with black spot algae, i can take off the algae simply by rubbing it but i cannot do this to the whole entire tank. i never had this problem with the PC lights. all am saying is T5HO even at dim lights cause these problems for me, the whole purpose of reducing the light is to reduce the algae. isn't it? why make the lights look dim when you could have brighter lights while keeping the algae away with PC type bulbs.
its is also in Hoppy's light comparison chart, where PC is still considered low light while having very high wattage compare to T5.
|08-13-2011 11:55 PM|
Perhaps I am missing something, but how do you get "brighter" light will reducing par?
I think perhaps you are confusing color temp, which could be done with any light configuration. Or perhaps your experience with PC bulbs involved a whiter spectrum than the bulbs you've seen in t5ho.
I do not know of any way possible that light could actually be "brighter" while being less intense.
"brightness" is either a reflection of color temp(which can be changed with any type) or par. Either way, the connection to PC bulbs being "brighter" doesn't make any sense.
|This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.|