|01-09-2013 05:53 AM|
A YouTube video about Walstad's method.
|01-09-2013 05:36 AM|
|Colorblizzle||Maybe. Ill keep looking on occasion tho. I do want that book|
|01-09-2013 05:34 AM|
|Django||Yep, you're right. I don't know how that happened. It's a good coffee table book so maybe it's the season.|
|01-09-2013 05:07 AM|
|Colorblizzle||Cheapest I saw it on amazon was $65|
|01-09-2013 05:01 AM|
|01-07-2013 05:58 PM|
|Colorblizzle||Ok thanks. I want slow steady growth and I will be fertilizing so hopefully all goes well|
|01-07-2013 05:56 PM|
From my understanding, your most common low-tech plants would be Java ferns / moss and Anubias varieties, Cryptocoryne, green temple, Sagittaria, Vallisneria, etc.
A lot of the sword variety plants generally require more to the medium spectrum of lighting.
Now keep in mind, this doesn't mean you "can't" grow them successfully in a low-light / low-tech setup, it just generally means you will get a slower growth rate and will have to ensure proper nutrients, water quality, etc.
|01-07-2013 04:15 PM|
|Colorblizzle||I have looked for that book and have read a lot of articles about her method and it seems for the most part that's what I'm aiming at but that book is $60 at the cheapest I've found and none of my library's carry it. And that's how I plan to stock I just hope my lighting will be adequate because like I said a few posts up options are limited|
|01-07-2013 04:13 PM|
Look for a book called ecology of the planted aquarium by Diana walstad. Tells you everything. But basically, if you plant heavily enough with fast growing plants from the start, you can add fish within minutes. And it's completely safe.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
|01-07-2013 04:01 PM|
|Colorblizzle||Lol are those plants I named low light?|
|01-07-2013 04:00 PM|
|Airstreamin||See, you got this, what you need us for?|
|01-07-2013 03:58 PM|
|Colorblizzle||I'd have to stand on the dresser to pee in the tank so ill just skip that step but yeah I know wattage is important. I decided on this fixture after running all my options and coming up with nothing practical. T8 best I could do was 15w and couldn't find PAR ratings. T5 couldn't find a single tube fixture and don't wanna do a dual because with that much light I will NEED CO2 and I don't want to use it. Only other option was CFL and I don't want to use screw in bulbs. From what I hear that's what most people do in these smaller tanks but I can't bring myself to using them. Seems TOO low-tech lol. But idk which plants I'm using yet. Royals, ludwigia chain sword are my only definite choices|
|01-07-2013 03:52 PM|
Seriously though, if you're afraid (or gf in this case) of ammonia in the house, just pee in your tank. Yes I'm being serious, how you think most of us aquaponics / veg gardeners get our compost cycles started?
Regardless, as long as you take it slow and ease into the cycle you can go either route. Personally I prefer the fishless cycle as there's no point in a needless death, but on the other hand, get yourself a hardy fish or 2, let them cycle the tank and then sell them back to the LFS and get what you really want. That's what I did with my last tank, worked great.
Also, you stated you're running LEDs, and while PAR rating is important, so is wattage, with that low of a wattage you'll want to make sure you're not using plants that are heavy light usage plants as they won't thrive very well.
|01-07-2013 03:12 AM|
|Colorblizzle||And djAngo keep the tips coming. Everyone else too this is my first planted so my ears are WIDE OPEN|
|01-07-2013 03:11 AM|
|Colorblizzle||I'm using black flourite sand. And for lights it's only 10w but I'm using the finnex fugeray LED light fixture. Should give me 30-40 PAR. I will stick fish lightly at first. And once I have a jungle and I see that the nitrates are building ill stop adding fish. I keep changing my mind on what I want tho first I wanted celestial pearl danios, then I wanted neon tetras, then I wanted cardinal tetras, then tequila sunrise guppies Nd now I'm thinking glo-fish. Opinions? I will for sure have an otocinclus in there tho regardless.|
|This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.|