|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Advertisements | |
| Get Rid of Advertisements | |
|
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Banned
|
DIY CO2. Can you use a valve to control amount?
I am using a 2 liter DIY CO2 with a hagen ladder to dissolve the bubbles. I have to use an bubbler under the ladder periodically throughout the day in order to keep the ph from dropping too low. My ph will drop below 6 if I allow all of the CO2 to dissolve. The bubbles interfere with the CO2 and make the CO2 run up the ladder extremely fast causing pretty much none to dissolve. I have been testing my ph in order to find the right timing of the bubbler to keep the ph constant around 6.5. It is a major pain in the arse.
Instead of wasting so much CO2 can I use an in-line valve in the CO2 line to lessen the bubble rate of the CO2, thus saving CO2 for the long run? I am using poly tubing and can get an in-line valve to control the CO2 bubble rate going into the ladder. Of course the biggest concern is will I cause so much pressure to build up in the bottle that it will explode? I could also t-branch the tubing to another empty 2-liter bottle to allow the extra CO2 to build up in another container to lessen the pressure in the "fermenting" container basically giving the CO2 twice the volume to build. It would be a ghetto pressurized CO2 system but since my 10 gallon doesn't need much co2 I would rather save the CO2 than waste it and have to make a new batch every week.... Perhaps you could also increase the size of the operation and make DIY CO2 last even longer? Let me know what you guys think. Ryan The Valve The T-Branch |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
|
Quote:
You don't think that the extra container will alleviate the pressure problem? Does anyone know at what pressure a 2 liter will explode? I will try to find that out. Google........ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Wannabe Guru
|
I would be very concerned in the pressure you would build up in your bottles (even connecting two).
Perhaps a better way would be to use a two outlet control valve and just bleed off the tiny bit you don't need... that way you could adjust the bubble rate without causing pressure build up. Alternativly, I would recomend downsizing your reactor if you are coming up with much too much CO2. Cut your mix in half, and possibly reduce the yeast to about 1/4. Also, adding a teaspoon of baking soda will slow down your reaction... producing a slower but longer rate of CO2. Of course, you will probably want to play around with it while leaving your current system as is, since big fluctuations in CO2 favors the outbreak of algae.
__________________
Something so expensive and addictive HAS to be illegal. I'm just waiting for the police to break down my door and confinscate my fish food.
________www.2000webdesign.com________ Angelfish are NO angels! = What's my sign? I'm an aquarist. 5- 2.5g's, 2- 5g's, 7g, 2- 10g's, 12g, 18g, 3- 20g's, 2- 30g's, 50gHex, 2- 55g's, and about 10- 1g tuppers Colorado Aquarium Society |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Planted Tank Enthusiast
|
this sounds interesting. are there any other things you can use to contain the yeast and etc in that can handle high pressures besides 2 liter bottles ? An extra container sounds cool but won't help your issue. Wait how about putting the 2 liter bottle in a bucket with an aquarium heater and adjusting the temps to get the bubble rate you want ? higher temps = more co2
lower temps = less co2
__________________
- Fishlover
.My Tanks : |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Born to be mild
|
Don't... is all I can say. Yeast fermentation can create extreme pressure, definitely enough to shatter glass bottles.
You can use a valve to control DIY CO2 if you use it at one end of a T, so when the valve opens the CO2 will just escape into the atmosphere, when it closes it goes into your diffuser. While this would work, you are looking into spending money that you could use towards a much more convenient pressurized setup. Better to reduce the bottle volume, that would be the simplest way of adjusting the amount of CO2. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Algae Crumpler
|
I wouldn't mess with it unless you see problems from too much co2. I've kept cherries and otos in a ph of 6.5 and wouldn't worry about taking it lower if need be.
__________________
"Yeah, I wanted to help - that was before Montagne lost his fricking arm." -Arzt
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Banned
|
I really don't think that after adding another bottle there could be a serious risk of having one of the bottles burst. After about a week the bubble rate is just about where I want it to be, which means for the first week I would be "storing" about 1/2 of the overall generated CO2 in another container. Basically for the first week the bubbles are coming out twice as fast as I would like. Twice as fast means a lot more undissolved CO2. The faster they move up the ladder the less gets dissolved. Using a valve would make it a controlled release and thus having the bubbles emit at the exact rate you want according to the ph you want.
Ya see the problem is not the time it takes for the yeast to die off, but instead the amount of wasted CO2. The yeast could die off long before I run out of CO2 if I could figure out how to safely do this. Achieving the least amount of wasted CO2 would really help especially in the long run. Perhaps instead of using (2) 2-Liter coke bottles, why not something stronger? The reason why the bottles burst is because of the plastic. The plastic can't hold up to high pressure. The reason why CO2 canisters are metal. I am going to do more research into this. If I could find a better airtight container that could withstand higher psi then I could make a huge batch of yeast/sugar that could last a while using a valve....... Poor man's DIY pressurized CO2. Maybe a thermos container?? Give some ideas.. Some would say why waste the time, just go pressurized. But I figure the amount of money you could save versus buying a whole pressurized system and having to refill. When all it would take is some cheap poly tubing, cheap valves, cheap containers, yeast, and sugar. In the end it is all about avoiding an explosion. Hehe. Lemme know what you think. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Planted Tank Enthusiast
|
This is just my P.O.V. but in my 10g I use a 2l bottle/20oz DIY. I've been tinkering with a recipe that so far has lasted a couple weeks and I haven't had too much co2. It takes a little longer to make but for me it's worth it. I can send you my recipe if you like but I'm not finished tinkering yet.
__________________
Spread the word...
http://www.deathbydyeing.org Support Wilma ... www.wilmasthecause.org sometimes you get shown the light in the darkest of places if you look at it right |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Algae Grower
|
If you cool the yeast-sugar mix bottle with some ice on the outside.. it will decrease the rate of fermentation and thus CO2 produced.
I haven't tried this but just a thought that struck me .. maybe this is one way of taking care of CO2 production rate .. Opinions please folks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Planted Tank Enthusiast
|
i have an old school valve that basically leaks the pressure its kind of like a needle valve that has a hole in it as you decrease air flow ( its ment for o2 pumps ) it leaks the air that normally would be just going through if you look around you may bee able to find one. mine is lime green.
__________________
happy fishing![]() 75 gallon amazon biotope UNDER destruction its a jungle in there and the fish are lost 20 gal apple snail babies + 2 gold Occies |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Planted Tank Guru
|
How about moving the bubble release point closer to the top of the ladder? Am I the only one that noticed this obvious method?
Trying to control the output of a yeast based system with any type of non-relieving valve system is asking for trouble.
__________________
The Original Custom CO2 Regulator Dry Ferts Link to my Guide
Purveyor of the Brutal Truth In Heaven We Were Formed... In Hell We Were Trained... On Earth We Were Released... United States Marine Corps! |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Banned
|
The issue is simple, yet complicated. With DIY CO2 there is a ton of wasted CO2 since the output of CO2 is high in the beginning and gradually decreases. This not only causes you to have to make a new batch every week, but also causes inconsistent CO2 levels. Using DIY CO2 places you completely dependent upon the fermentation process, meaning the CO2 output is directly related to the fermentation without anything other means of controlling the CO2. Pressurized is better because you can control it, obviously.
That is the simple part, simply knowing that the yeast has complete control over you. The hard part, which I am going to attempt to do, is trying to control the output by "storing" the excess CO2 in order to achieve a more consistent and long term CO2 output. Incorporating a device to also completely shutoff the CO2 output at night is obviously an even riskier proposition. I am not an expert at physics, but I think with some research, and experimenting, I could devise a method to "store" the excess CO2 and control the output. PSI is the main issue. CO2 pressure differs when temperature is increased or decreased, hence why cooling can make it come out slower and last longer. If I could find a CO2 reservoir that can handle a lot of PSI than I could make a big batch of CO2 without worrying about explosion. First I need to figure out the total volume of CO2 that is outputted given the mix of yeast/sugar that I use. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|