Quote:
Originally Posted by Hypancistrus
I'm not an expert. I'm a hobbyist who only buys things. I happen to have my own opinions. I have no affiliations with any businesses, partners, or any websites. I'm don't sell anything or make any money whatsoever from the aquarium hobby. I also don't care if others disagree with my opinions. To accuse me of having an "agenda" is both preposterous and insulting.
|
The issues about "agenda" are to have us believe the baloney rational used to justify ideas/contentions about ag vs lab grade fertilizers, then try and give baloney about Art and scaping being some how correlated to a method of dosing fertilizers, then using the ADA example where they obviously have a source, albeit not the water column as much, for PO4/NO3, that is not about Yamato green nor why it works in some vs other tanks.
You want me to believe that baloney?
I can easily say that is insulting and a joke to me. I can take all sorts of stuff personal and insulting, I do not. Should I be a bad sport about it and take it all personal after getting pummeled? No, I'll expose the baloney for what it is.
Now:
You do not have to have a web site, nor sell a product, nor sell anything on line/in the hobby etc to promote an "agenda". Where'd that come from? The same pot the other arguments you used?
If you add 3, now 4 arguments to support your contention that have
nothing to do with the topic, then it really looks like "agenda", rather than debate.
Am I wrong about you there? Then why did you add those for support? Others made similar comments so it's not just me. Are you suggesting that we are all that stupid and dumb to fall for that argument?
Regards,
Tom Barr