BGA/Cyano Nomenclature - The Planted Tank Forum
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 2 (permalink) Old 03-21-2013, 02:57 PM Thread Starter
Planted Tank Enthusiast
Gold Finger's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Wpg. MB Canada
Posts: 849
BGA/Cyano Nomenclature

I am glad we don't tend to call diatomes "brown algae" and regret that we often call cyanobacteria "Blue Green Algae". It does not bother me because it is inaccurate, it bothers me because we are sometimes perpetuating a false idea to newcomers in the hobby. I think it is important that newcomers recognize that when they see Cyano in their tanks they are seeing a toxic and hostile organism. As much as we hate algae and it can antagonize our plants and our nerves it (all algae, as far as I know) is benign or beneficial to our non plant livestock (fish, crustations, snails, etc.) unlike Cyano which poisons and can even kill the fish. I was once fooled by the term BGA before understanding its true nature and allowed it to flourish in a tank to the detriment of my fish. All ended well enough for me, but I will never call Cyano BGA.

As an afterthought: The term "Livestock" meaning everything but the plants is clearly inaccurate as plants are clearly alive, but it does not bother me as it does no harm. Some inaccuracies matter and some don't.

Ver. 1.0 80 gallon dirt goldfish tank (defunct)

Ver. 2.0 bare bottom same tank another approach (defunct)

Ver. 3.0 Pool filter sand same tank now

Farming Algae

Goldfish are among the worst fish for beginners.
Gold Finger is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 2 (permalink) Old 03-21-2013, 03:32 PM
Planted Tank Guru
plantbrain's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The swamp
Posts: 13,609
There are some species of BGA/Cyano that are toxic to livestock in large amounts, the Oscillitoria is not, that's the genus we have. It also does not form heterocyst, so does not fix Nitrogen gas, not that the NO3 is even low enough to force it to go that route in our aquariums(Plants rot and die and leach out N before that range is reached).

I've seen tanks covered, we likely all have over the years.
Fish seemed okay to me. Neglect and algae are two distinct things.
You can have algae, but not neglect the tank. But in most cases, an algae covered tank is more commonly associated with a neglected tank at/on some level. That, not the BGA, is the main issues I'd argue.

Tom Barr
plantbrain is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the The Planted Tank Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome