Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Momotaro
Maybe for the application the website is describing, but it doesn't translate to our application. They are talking about using a pounds of sugar, while we use much less. It just doesn't translate. equating the two in our application is misleading.
|
How so? One pound of sugar is theoretically capable of producing so many cubic feet of CO2. One ounce can theoretically produce 1/16th as much.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Momotaro
Hydroponics? No need to cough or clear your throat. It has been mentioned here a quite a bit. No need to make allusions to drugs either. It was developed as a method to grow food crop.
|
I re-read the document at the link I provided. Seems I was mistaken.
The document I *was* looking at a few nights ago when researching alternate forms of CO2 production had some additional information, such as "risks of regularly transporting dry ice to the growroom", and "burning hydrocarbons may help eliminate unwanted smells", and was obviously targetted at drug farmers. I didn't save the link, so when posting it here I attempted to relocate the document by repeating the search terms I originally used in Google from memory. This document is almost, but not quite, the same.