As @[U]roadmaster[/U] rightly pointed out:
Rephrased as if it was me who says this: "All this thread was ... was a not too thinly veiled attack on EI method along with it's creator, and those who use the method. It's my genuine concern/frustration that all hobbyist's do not immediately abandon this particular method/principal's, and adopt more scientifically controlled method of supplying only what plant's need for any given day/week ... Thing's get heated or perceived to be off topic when not all agree with either side's view, and where no so thinly veiled attacks on ones intelligence or lack thereof, are lobbed about. The hope was that through argument, the sinner's would repent and come into the realization of their unscientific way's. But this is easier to hope for, than what may be desired. Clearly the science presented takes a fair bit of intelligence by those who present it that way. Clearly I was intelligent enough to realize fairly quickly the difficulty in getting the masses in agreement. With this intelligence clearly evident, then it becomes more [than clear that] the whole exercise/thread [was] less than intelligent attempt at discrediting one method, while hoping to shame other's into submission. [But] some of you [are obviously] smarter than I figured on."
Thus there is no need to continue in this farce.
Rephrased as if it was me who says this: "All this thread was ... was a not too thinly veiled attack on EI method along with it's creator, and those who use the method. It's my genuine concern/frustration that all hobbyist's do not immediately abandon this particular method/principal's, and adopt more scientifically controlled method of supplying only what plant's need for any given day/week ... Thing's get heated or perceived to be off topic when not all agree with either side's view, and where no so thinly veiled attacks on ones intelligence or lack thereof, are lobbed about. The hope was that through argument, the sinner's would repent and come into the realization of their unscientific way's. But this is easier to hope for, than what may be desired. Clearly the science presented takes a fair bit of intelligence by those who present it that way. Clearly I was intelligent enough to realize fairly quickly the difficulty in getting the masses in agreement. With this intelligence clearly evident, then it becomes more [than clear that] the whole exercise/thread [was] less than intelligent attempt at discrediting one method, while hoping to shame other's into submission. [But] some of you [are obviously] smarter than I figured on."
Thus there is no need to continue in this farce.