what low Tech means ? - The Planted Tank Forum
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 14 (permalink) Old 08-11-2012, 06:12 PM Thread Starter
Planted Member
Gamezawy's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Egypt
Posts: 258
what low Tech means ?

hi all

i am bit confused about the name low Tech

so is it means the following ?

using low light

no Co2 at all

low light plants only

no fertilizers at all

i would like really to know what is the main concept of the low tech Tanks

thank you
Gamezawy is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 14 (permalink) Old 08-11-2012, 08:04 PM
Prodigious Plant Pundit
Geniusdudekiran's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 5,403
Correct on all accounts but fertilization. Typically you'd have some sort of basic fert regime, whether it be excel dosing or EI (estimative index). Hope I helped.

"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication." -- Steve Jobs
Geniusdudekiran is offline  
post #3 of 14 (permalink) Old 08-11-2012, 08:16 PM
Planted Tank Enthusiast
WallaceGrover's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 727
Personally I think it's a matter of pressurized CO2 vs no CO2 at all...
WallaceGrover is offline  
post #4 of 14 (permalink) Old 08-11-2012, 09:05 PM
Wannabe Guru
Knotyoureality's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 1,369
Kinda' depends on the person defining it.

Generally C02 is a defining point, but some folks include it in "low tech" if it's a DIY set up. Same thing for lights. Substrates are going to range from the latest specialized mixes to mud straight from the garden. Low light is more common, but high-light plants are possible with the right conditions--including cobbled together low-tech light systems or tanks with direct sunlight available. And the fauna are going to be as varied as the flora. If not more so.
Knotyoureality is offline  
post #5 of 14 (permalink) Old 08-11-2012, 09:49 PM
Planted Tank Nation
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Oak Park, IL
Posts: 889
low tech seems to me to be less work and less money and high tech is usually the opposite
mitchfish9 is offline  
post #6 of 14 (permalink) Old 08-11-2012, 10:08 PM
Pelvicachromis Lover!
Complexity's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,080
I think low tech refers to having less technology on the tank. So the tank is using less equipment overall or the equipment that it is using is more basic. Since pressurized CO2 requires specialized equipment, it generally becomes the determining factor between "high tech" and "low tech" setups; however, it doesn't have to be.

I look at a "high tech" setup as one with a combination of high light, CO2 (in any form), and regular ferts. This type of tank is driven by the high lighting, and if the CO2 or ferts were ever stopped, this tank would be in trouble fast.

I see a "low tech" tank as one with lower lighting which means CO2 and ferts are optional, but definitely not required. Usually if they are supplied, they are supplied at a lower rate than what's used for high tech tanks. The CO2 and/or ferts can be stopped without the tank going into an immediate tailspin. In fact, many low tech tanks receive no extra CO2 or ferts at all.

The question is how to name a tank that's in an in-between category. What about a tank with medium lighting, pressurized CO2, and only a moderate amount of ferts? Is that high tech or low tech? What about the exact same tank, but change the pressurized CO2 to either DIY CO2 or Excel. Does that change the tank's category?

There are no set rules as to what is a high tech tank and what is a low tech tank. It's really up to the person using the term. I use the terms only because there is no other simple phrase that identifies the type of tank I'm talking about, basically out of a lack of better terms to use.

Vicki Rena Filstar pimp #142 (four XP4s/three XP2s/one XP1) Eheim pimp #301 (Pro II 2128) Victor pimp #27 (VTS-253B-320)

90g - Journal Pelvicachromis taeniatus 'Moliwe' 75g - Journal Pelvicachromis pulcher 'Lagos Red' Better Pics 8-24
29g - Journal Pelvicachromis pulcher 'unknown' -- 29g - Pelvicachromis taeniatus 'Moliwe'
5g - RCS colony 2.5g - Journal Retired
Complexity is offline  
post #7 of 14 (permalink) Old 08-11-2012, 10:22 PM
Wannabe Guru
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Centennial,Co
Posts: 1,836
Low tech is code for cheap.
BruceF is offline  
post #8 of 14 (permalink) Old 08-12-2012, 02:38 AM Thread Starter
Planted Member
Gamezawy's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Egypt
Posts: 258
thanks all for the inputs really appreciated
Gamezawy is offline  
post #9 of 14 (permalink) Old 08-12-2012, 05:20 PM
Planted Tank Guru
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Contra Costa CA
Posts: 11,721
I think it is a sliding scale, and each component can be rated for high, low or in between. Where you draw the line at each item is up to you.

I think the most basic idea is that low tech means less tinkering with the tank, and less complex equipment. Set it up, fine tune it, and let it run with less input than a high tech set up.
That set up might be quite complex, with mineralized top soil, substrate fertilizer, timer for the lights and other things that take time initially, but in the end mean less time each day or week in maintenance.
Diana is offline  
post #10 of 14 (permalink) Old 08-12-2012, 05:54 PM
Algae Grower
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Fort Smith, AR
Posts: 49
here's an example of my low tech 20L:

-cheap CFL lighting
-dirt under substrate, no fertilizer needed
-powerhead, no filter needed, even with fish, just plant heavily
-i do run a heater but as long as your room temp is regulated you don't really need one during the summer. (or winter if you keep it warm at night)

total cost to set up tank (including buying the tank from $1 per gallon petco sale) - ~$85 not including fish. can be even cheaper if you have some extra equipment laying around.

weekly maintenance = 1 hour or less

you can go even more low tech. some people have planted shrimp bowls with no heater, filter, and they use ambient lighting.
gelbschnee is offline  
post #11 of 14 (permalink) Old 08-12-2012, 08:40 PM
Planted Tank Guru
talontsiawd's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 4,678
Send a message via AIM to talontsiawd
My main qualification is no CO2 at all and no need for CO2. It doesn't have to be low light, it just has to have low enough light to where CO2 is not needed. There is a difference between just being able to grow Java moss and Java Fern and colorful stems, but both can be done in what I consider a low tech tank.

So, low tech also includes lighting. In the past, there were not as many lighting choices so having a MH or T5 setup used to be "high tech" by the nature of the technology was new (and expensive). Now I don't really include lighting type as it seems you can do all without the need for CO2, which is my personal main qualification.

I don't consider adding ferts to bring it past low tech. But, I feel a low tech tank shouldn't require a lot of work, meaning ferts a few times a month would be reasonable.

Filtration can be anything, especially when we are talking nano's. An AC 70, for example, may be low tech compared to an Eheim 2211 but provides much more flow so I don't consider a canister high tech, per say. I have a AC 50 on a tank I consider "low tech", just because I have one, but have a canister on two tanks I consider "low tech".

However, in general, you would normally assume that if someone doesn't invest in lighting, they don't invest in CO2, or a high end filter. That's not always the case though. You see people with no CO2 with a lot of "technology" in high end filters and high end lighting that still is low enough to not use CO2. You also see people who skimp on filtration and lighting that run CO2.

I have also seen tanks that are low light, high CO2, and moss only. I still consider that "high tech", especially with LED lighting, canister, etc. Even though the CO2 isn't needed to prevent algae, it can grow moss very well in lower lighting.

At the end of the day, it's all opinion. As said, for me it has to have CO2 (pressurized). IMO, lighting plays a factor as people usually run more light but I think you can have a "high tech" setup that is low light. I don't personally filters play into this. Well, maybe if you have a bunch of inline stuff and accessories but no CO2, that wouldn't mean high tech, maybe mid-tech, without CO2. Again, just my personal opinion.
talontsiawd is offline  
post #12 of 14 (permalink) Old 08-15-2012, 03:01 AM
Algae Grower
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: kansas
Posts: 113
For me low tech means plants, lights, substrate, and fish. No other equipment. Minimal tank maintenance.

high tech means co2 , regular water testing, and/or complicated fertilization.

If it doesn't fit in either of those categories its just a planted tank.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Tapatalk 2

Lifetime aquarium addict!

Check out my YouTube aquarium channel:

polypterus491 is offline  
post #13 of 14 (permalink) Old 08-16-2012, 04:08 AM
Wannabe Guru
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: West Hollywood, CA
Posts: 1,017
I'm in the camp that believes that most people refer to low light when they say low tech. Low tech = low enough light to not need CO2 = slow growth = very little maintenance.

To me, filters, lights, timers, substrate, etc have nothing to do with low vs. high tech. You pretty much always have to have some sort of a filter, so you might as well have a good one. If you have root feeding plants, you need a nutritious substrate. Might as well get the best growth with the least amount of effort. Whether that's Miracle Grow or Aquasoil is just a matter of personal preference. Most tanks need heaters and lights and timers... there's nothing particularly high-tech about an inline heater or a $5 timer, it's just a matter of convenience.

Low-tech doesn't mean cheap to me at all. Just simple, low maintenance, and not a ton of equipment taking up space. No CO2, DIY or otherwise. DIY CO2 to me seems like a lot of work and pressurized is a ton of extra equipment and extra risks. I want to be able to go on vacation for two weeks and be confident that my tank will need no special maintenance while I'm gone.

Just my two cents. This is something everyone defines differently.

Last edited by FriendsNotFood; 08-16-2012 at 08:16 PM. Reason: Typo
FriendsNotFood is offline  
post #14 of 14 (permalink) Old 08-16-2012, 04:23 AM
Wannabe Guru
pejerrey's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Oakland, California
Posts: 1,935
Low tech doesn't mean low budget to me either. Neither is an excuse to have an ugly tank.

It means to me that is *usually* low light and has *intentionally* less equipment, dosing and maintenance.

In other words, low metabolism.

A heavily planted shrimp tank is possible!
pejerrey is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the The Planted Tank Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome