IF your going to do 2 channels I "think" it is always best to have a "red tone" channel and a "blue tone" channel...
your layout mixes thing up too much..
It might work fine but I'm not seeing it..
Think of it this way..
Say one channel has an "effective" K of say 4000K
Another has an effective K of say 10000K
The 2 channels would equal 7000K w/ both on full power..
What has worked best is(for me YMMV) having reds/ww/(up to 6500K) on one channel and
blue/cw/violet (10000k) on another..
W/ 3 channels I'd add a green/cyan/white channel but not having that option i'd either intersperse them w/ both channels or go for the one or the other (brilliant huh)
My theory is RGB make white so you won't really tone anything RB/Cyan?deep red also make white..
ect...
Jeffs agree w/ this plan..
Oh and yes.. too much blue/white..
IF you want the blue and red on one channel throw the cyan in there as well dilute the blue w/ a much warmer blue than 10000K
Ch2 will be "effectively" 7250K.. You will never go below this color temp considering the composition of ch 1..So even w/ 1 completely off (which has your reds ect) you are a bit too "cool" in color..
Ch1 has 20 450nm blue.. w 2 660 red and 2 630 red..You'd be "off the chart" in K rating and basically a blue light..
Combined on full (1 and 2) you'd be "lucky" to hit 20000K....
What I consider ideal is to have c1 = 3000K and ch2 = 10000K so that both on full (or dimmed equally) you have 6500k... tweaking one or another will shift your K color (for your enjoyment) in the direction you prefer..
There are infinite ways to achieve this.....but what they designed is not one of them......